Guy Harris wrote:
> Unfortunately, that doesn't handle the "Generator 1"/"Generator 2"/...
> issue.
>
> It might be useful to add new APIs that take an array index as an
> argument, and that add the array index value after the field name in
> the display representation of the item. (I thin
I
click on one "group" of those in the middle pane, will it highlight the proper
bytes in the bottom display
Sincerely,
John Jamulla
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark"
Sent: Tues
On Feb 27, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> You would typically use proto_tree_add_item() and define the bitmask
> as
> part of the hf[] field registration.
Unfortunately, that doesn't handle the "Generator 1"/"Generator 2"/...
issue.
It might be useful to add new APIs that take an
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:04:27AM -0500, John Jamulla wrote:
> I have some data in my own protocol that is really a set of 512, 2
> byte bit fields, and I want to display something like:
>
> Generator 1 Fielda
> Generator 1 Fieldb
> Generator 1 Fieldc
> Generator 1 Fieldd
> Generator 2
Hello,
I have a working dissector now, and have figured out many part of how to
display individual values, fields, strings, etc. I have some subtrees as
well, but...
I have some data in my own protocol that is really a set of 512, 2 byte bit
fields, and I want to display something like:
Generato
