Dario Lombardo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM Martin Burnicki
> mailto:martin.burni...@meinberg.de>> wrote:
>
> So IMO it would make more sense to display such values with a fixed
> floating point format similar to the Peer Clock Precision field, e.g.
>
> 0.00 instead of
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM Martin Burnicki
wrote:
> So IMO it would make more sense to display such values with a fixed
> floating point format similar to the Peer Clock Precision field, e.g.
>
> 0.00 instead of 0
> 0.944107 instead of 0.944107055664063
> 0.76 instead of 7.62939453125
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 09:48:46AM +0200, Martin Burnicki wrote:
> > Eventually you (or the email admin) can find out why this happens.
> >
> > I don't have access to the infrastructure, but others can check.
>
> Just FYI: Surprisingly, the confirmation emails for my private email
> address
Dario Lombardo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:20 PM Martin Burnicki
> mailto:martin.burni...@meinberg.de>> wrote:
[...]
> Then I tried to create account on bugzilla with that private email
> address, and bugzilla said a confirmation email had been sent. However,
> that email never ar
Guy Harris wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> On Aug 6, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Martin Burnicki
>> wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I have seen, proto_tree_add_double() seems to add a double
>>> value to the output tree,
>>
>> *All* doubles use the same format string. The part of the
On Aug 6, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Martin Burnicki
> wrote:
>
>> As far as I have seen, proto_tree_add_double() seems to add a double
>> value to the output tree,
>
> *All* doubles use the same format string. The part of the format string for
> the n
On Aug 6, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Martin Burnicki wrote:
> As far as I have seen, proto_tree_add_double() seems to add a double
> value to the output tree,
*All* doubles use the same format string. The part of the format string for
the number is
"%." G_STRINGIFY(DBL_DIG) "g"
DBL_DIG is 15
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:20 PM Martin Burnicki
wrote:
>
> I think to do this would be easy for someone who is a bit familiar with
> the wireshark source code. However, I'm new to this stuff so I can
> potentially get it wrong unless I'm doing quite a bit of investigation
> first. ;-)
>
>
Don't be
Hi Dario,
Dario Lombardo wrote:
> Hi Martin
> If you can code the patch, feel free to push it to gerrit for code
> review.
I think to do this would be easy for someone who is a bit familiar with
the wireshark source code. However, I'm new to this stuff so I can
potentially get it wrong unless I'm
Hi Martin
If you can code the patch, feel free to push it to gerrit for code review.
Otherwise, your best bet is bugzilla. Which login issues are you
experiencing?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:20 AM Martin Burnicki
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> actually the root dispersion field from an NTP packet is only d
Hi all,
actually the root dispersion field from an NTP packet is only displayed
with 4 digits after the decimal point, i.e. 0.1 ms resolution.
However, modern NTP servers may provide a better root dispersion. E.g.,
if only the LSB in the scaled integer of an NTP packet is set then this
means ~15
11 matches
Mail list logo
