Re: [Wireshark-dev] Clearly, someone thought no one should be using CommView after 2038

On Apr 18, 2021, at 10:18 PM, Eugène Adell wrote: > probably the guy writing this considered the "Epochalypse" problem. Or wanted *some* test to help rule out files that are probably not ConnView NCF files (there is no file header, so there's no file magic number, and there's no packet magic n

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Clearly, someone thought no one should be using CommView after 2038

Hello, probably the guy writing this considered the "Epochalypse" problem. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem if necessary. best regards E.A. Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 04:18, Richard Sharpe a écrit : > > Hi folks, > > I just came across this validation check in the commview wireta

[Wireshark-dev] Clearly, someone thought no one should be using CommView after 2038

Hi folks, I just came across this validation check in the commview wiretap code: if (... cv_hdr.year < 1970 || cv_hdr.year >= 2038 || ...) -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者) ___ Sent via:Wireshark-d