On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan wrote:
> I am porting wireshark to an embedded platform. I managed to
> cross-compile wireshark (tshark, mainly) and run it on the 32-bit
> PowerPC target. However, the executables and shared libraries take
> about 80MB. Pleas
Hi Christopher/Guy,
Thanks for the quick response. Let me give it a try.
Regards
dharani
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Christopher Maynard <
chris.mayn...@gtech.com> wrote:
> Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan writes:
>
> > I am trying to reduce the size. I would like to explore various ways like
On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Christopher Maynard wrote:
> TYou can also try building "--with-plugins=no"
...which you might have to do *anyway* if you want a static build: "static"
means "100% static" (rather than "statically link with some libraries), and
"100% static" means, at least on som
Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan writes:
> I am trying to reduce the size. I would like to explore various ways like
remove support for some protocols (USB, ATM, etc) and do static build, etc. I
did see some pointers related to this but it looks like they are outdated.
You might try editing epan/disse
Hi All,
I am new to wireshark development and this mailing list.
I am porting wireshark to an embedded platform. I managed to cross-compile
wireshark (tshark, mainly) and run it on the 32-bit PowerPC target. However,
the executables and shared libraries take about 80MB. Please see the file
sizes
