Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building 0.99.4 under MacOS X (fixes)

2007-01-04 Thread Guy Harris
Andreas Fink wrote: > Problem #1: LDFLAGS make ./configure fail. > > I would need to add -Wl,-single_module to LDFLAGS (otherwise we get > errors speaking about multi module) > I can not do this like above because ./configure not wanting to compile. > Solution is to add it to the LDFLAGS lines

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building 0.99.4 under MacOS X (fixes)

2007-01-04 Thread Andreas Fink
On 04.01.2007, at 13:09, Guy Harris wrote: Andreas Fink wrote: Here is how I configure export PATH="/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/usr/ sbin:/usr/local/sbin" export LDFLAGS="-lz -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-search_paths_first -Wl,- single_module" So why is the "-lz" necessary?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building 0.99.4 under MacOS X (fixes)

2007-01-04 Thread Guy Harris
Andreas Fink wrote: > Here is how I configure > > export PATH="/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/usr/ > sbin:/usr/local/sbin" > export LDFLAGS="-lz -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-search_paths_first -Wl,- > single_module" So why is the "-lz" necessary? The configure script should add t

[Wireshark-dev] Building 0.99.4 under MacOS X (fixes)

2007-01-04 Thread Andreas Fink
Hi folks, After receiving a newer MacBook pro, I'm installing wireshark and all its dependencies again (gtk+ 2 this time so over 20 libs to compile), so I can finalize a doubleclickable installer which is independent of any packaging system like "fink" or "ports" so anyone can use wireshar