On 10/10/13 9:45 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 10 October 2013 01:33, Gerald Combs For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
> SDK in a central location on your system (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
> WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything else (which means taking
On 10/09/13 09:15, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi Guy,
2013/10/9 Guy Harris :
I think nowadays almost no one builds Wireshark for their own (apart
from Developers) and those who do can easily
install the tools for it.
Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that statement. I've seen (questions from)
plenty of
On 10/09/13 05:47, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi Gerald,
2013/10/8 Gerald Combs :
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
release packages:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:15 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> I don't work with the mentioned systems, but I think the preferred way
> of installing programs is through packages and not compiling manually
> from source.
So *if*:
1) most users can get binary packages for their platforms;
On 10 October 2013 01:33, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 10/9/13 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > Hi Gerald,
> >
> > 2013/10/8 Gerald Combs :
> >> I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
> >> Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
> >>
> >> Unfortunatel
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 05:33:56PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Nmake: Qt isn't a part of wireshark-win{32,64}-libs. I haven't added it
> yet because it's fairly large:
>
> $ du -sh Qt-5.1.1-MSVC2010-win*
> 539MQt-5.1.1-MSVC2010-win32
> 141MQt-5.1.1-MSVC2010-win32.zip
> 594MQt-5.1.1-MS
: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release
For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
SDK in a central location on yoursystem (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything
, 2013 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release
For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
SDK in a central location on your system (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything else (which means taking up a lot of
space if you have mul
On 10/9/13 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Gerald,
>
> 2013/10/8 Gerald Combs :
>> I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
>> Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
>>
>> Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
>>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:15:41PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> According to our CMakeList.txt it will be:
> ...
> project(Wireshark C CXX)
>
> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
> set(CMAKE_BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY 2.6)
> ...
Unless you want to build with Qt5:
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/q
Hi Guy,
2013/10/9 Guy Harris :
>
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
>> Building Wireshark already needs way more tools than just make and a C
>> compiler.
>
> Perhaps we should fix that, so that the release tarball includes all
> generated source. I'd prefer not to require Fl
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Building Wireshark already needs way more tools than just make and a C
> compiler.
Perhaps we should fix that, so that the release tarball includes all generated
source. I'd prefer not to require Flex, yacc/Bison, Perl, or Python, ideally.
On 9 October 2013 11:21, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2013/10/9 Guy Harris :
> >
> > On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey
> wrote:
> >
> >> How about dropping the automake based and nmake based makefile systems
> and
> >> replacing both with CMake?
> >
> > So do you propose that people who are bu
On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Meaning we'll no longer be offering a development release that's older than the
current stable release?
(We should probably drop the development release from the download page
2013/10/9 Guy Harris :
>
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
>> How about dropping the automake based and nmake based makefile systems and
>> replacing both with CMake?
>
> So do you propose that people who are building from source only because they
> don't have binary packages a
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> How about dropping the automake based and nmake based makefile systems and
> replacing both with CMake?
So do you propose that people who are building from source only because they
don't have binary packages available for their platforms shoul
Hi Gerald,
2013/10/8 Gerald Combs :
> I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
> Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
>
> Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
> release packages:
>
> Windows 32-bit: GTK3 and Qt
>
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
release packages:
Windows 32-bit: GTK3 and Qt
Windows 64-bit: GTK2 and Qt
OS X 64-bit: Qt
OS X 32
18 matches
Mail list logo
