was in the past. So I
figured I might be doing something wrong and should ask.
-Original Message-
From: Evan Huus
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:03 PM, wrote:
&g
quot; for a project in their
personal gerrit preferences. There shouldn't be a need for an actual
mailing list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald Combs
> To: alexis.lagoutte ; Developer support list for
> Wireshark
> Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 2:50 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wiresha
n, Feb 10, 2014 2:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails
On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
>
> And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped
> receiving them at all...?
>
> Yes, i confirm too...
They've been mis-sent
On 02/10/14 14:30, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped
receiving them at all...?
Yes, i confirm too...
They've been mis-sent since Thursday. (It might help if the script were
running in p
On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
>
> And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped
> receiving them at all...?
>
> Yes, i confirm too...
They've been mis-sent since Thursday. (It might help if the script were
running in production mode instead of test mode
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jeff Morriss
> wrote:
> > I saw some emails about the -commits emails still being a work in
> progress
> > but that was a while ago. Is that still the case?
> >
> > I just thought I'd mention that I'm not a fan
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> I saw some emails about the -commits emails still being a work in progress
> but that was a while ago. Is that still the case?
>
> I just thought I'd mention that I'm not a fan of the current mails where we
> only get the one line summary of t
On Feb 5, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Than:
>
>> from c391d74 Fix wslua docs script to handle module names with
>> digits, like Int64/UInt64
Yes, the first line of some commit unrelated to the commit in question isn't
particularly relevant.
> I can learn a lot more (and
I saw some emails about the -commits emails still being a work in
progress but that was a while ago. Is that still the case?
I just thought I'd mention that I'm not a fan of the current mails where
we only get the one line summary of the change: I'd (much) prefer to
have the full text of the
