-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:23:54PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:03:56AM -0800, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>>
>>> I initially tried to implement the new STUN (STUNv2) in the same
>>> dissector, but
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:23:54PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:03:56AM -0800, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>
> > I initially tried to implement the new STUN (STUNv2) in the same
> > dissector, but at the end it was very messy. A little bit of
> > history can help to
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:03:56AM -0800, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> I initially tried to implement the new STUN (STUNv2) in the same
> dissector, but at the end it was very messy. A little bit of history
> can help to understand the situation:
Thanks for the explaination. I have committed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
> Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a new dissector for STUN v2, that is currently in WGLC at the IETF.
>>
>> The packet-stun.c file must be copied into packet-stun2.c before
>> applying this patch.
>>
>> I also att
Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a new dissector for STUN v2, that is currently in WGLC at the IETF.
>
> The packet-stun.c file must be copied into packet-stun2.c before
> applying this patch.
>
> I also attached a capture file that contains various STUN and STUN v2
> packets.
An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is a new dissector for STUN v2, that is currently in WGLC at the IETF.
The packet-stun.c file must be copied into packet-stun2.c before
applying this patch.
I also attached a capture file that contains various STUN and STUN v2
packets.
- -
