Hi Stephen,
> Committed as SVN revision 21618. Thanks for the improvements to that
> feature! Sorry for the delay in checking it in.
Thank you for picking up my patch.
The real problem that I am trying to solve is a little difficult
for me. It's SSL connections over a HTTP-proxy. When there i
Committed as SVN revision 21618. Thanks for the improvements to that
feature! Sorry for the delay in checking it in.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone review the patch I sent in about two weeks ago, it
> looks like it has been overlooked.
>
> T
Hi,
Could someone review the patch I sent in about two weeks ago, it
looks like it has been overlooked.
Thanks,
Sake
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:49:16PM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone reviewing the patch I sent last week?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Sake
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at
Hi,
Is anyone reviewing the patch I sent last week?
Cheers,
Sake
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:43:25AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment I'm looking into a problem that James Small has reported
> on the users-list:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg0004
Hi,
At the moment I'm looking into a problem that James Small has reported
on the users-list:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg00047.html
Although the problem seems to be a non-functional re-assembly of
the SSL packets when they are proxied. I will take some time to
get f
