Re: [Wireshark-dev] $Id$ and git

2014-02-13 Thread Alexis La Goutte
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > It seems that putting $Id$ in files stored in Git is pointless and > discouraged. > > Should we remove $Id$ from all the files (and remove the check from > checkAPIs)? > For checkAPIs, may be revert/change the code... to display a error if t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] $Id$ and git

2014-02-13 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > It seems that putting $Id$ in files stored in Git is pointless and > discouraged. > > Should we remove $Id$ from all the files (and remove the check from > checkAPIs)? ...and modify all our tools that generate code not to add $Id$ to the gen

Re: [Wireshark-dev] $Id$ and git

2014-02-13 Thread Evan Huus
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > It seems that putting $Id$ in files stored in Git is pointless and > discouraged. > > Should we remove $Id$ from all the files (and remove the check from > checkAPIs)? Agreed, they serve no purpose now. I've been removing them ad-hoc as I tou

Re: [Wireshark-dev] $Id$ and git

2014-02-13 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > It seems that putting $Id$ in files stored in Git is pointless and > discouraged. > > Should we remove $Id$ from all the files (and remove the check from > checkAPIs)? Denis Ovsienko recently got around to removing them from libpcap and tcpd

[Wireshark-dev] $Id$ and git

2014-02-13 Thread Jeff Morriss
It seems that putting $Id$ in files stored in Git is pointless and discouraged. Should we remove $Id$ from all the files (and remove the check from checkAPIs)? ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http