On 5/18/07, Sebastien Tandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not too much resources ... simply run for a few passes
>
> tools/fuzztest.sh mip1.cap mip2.cap mip3.cap
Oh, now your question makes sense! I hadn't noticed the script.
The script ran on a test capture for a few thousand passes with
On 5/16/07, Sebastien Tandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some quick comments :
> 1) please use proto_tree_add_item whenever possible. Don't use
> tvb_get_* if you don't intend to use the retrieved value for another
> purpose than inserting it in the tree.
Ok. I just used it to convert
On 5/16/07, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some additional notes:
>
> + {REGISTRATION_REVOCATION, "Registration Revocation"},
> + {REGISTRATION_REVOCATION, "Registration Revocation Acknowledgement"},
>
> The second one misses _ACKNOWLEDGEMENT in the symbol
Oops, how did I miss
(working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
/* packet-mip.c
* Routines for Mobile IP dissection
* Copyright 2000, Stefan Raab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * Copyright 2007, Ville Nuorvala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
* $Id$
*
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@
static int hf_mip_g = -1;
static int hf_mip_v = -1;
Hello,
attached is a patch that adds support for the following RFCs (and RFC-to-be):
RFC 3519 Mobile IP Traversal of Network Address Translation (NAT) Devices
RFC 3543 Registration Revocation in Mobile IPv4
RFC 4433 Mobile IPv4 Dynamic Home Agent (HA) Assignment (including the
not yet publishe
