[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark Capture Info Dialog behavior changed from 99.7 to 99.8?

2008-03-26 Thread Timothy.Cook
- WindowXP build. Why was the Capture Info Dialog behavior changed? Up to and including the 99.7 release, the user could minimize the Capture Dialog independent of the main Analyzer window. In release 99.8 this is no longer true. I have tried the preferences option 'Hide capture info dialog'. T

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Reason for dll to stop working

2008-02-29 Thread Timothy.Cook
I experienced a similar problem when corporate pushed Wireshark 0.99.7. All I needed to do was update my Wireshark build environment for 0.99.7 (including the tool set), then rebuild my DLL and on MS Windows XP, copy the DLL(s) to the C:\Program Files\Wireshark\plugins\0.99.7 directory. Tim ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registered Protocols?

2008-01-21 Thread Timothy.Cook
Then I'm really confused about how to hook a TCP Port for decoding if it's not done via Dissector? I know that's how the development guide suggested & several of TCP based dissectors worked when we wrote our internal dissectors. Our dissectors show up in the list of enabled Protocols. Has Wiresh

[Wireshark-dev] Registered Protocols?

2008-01-18 Thread Timothy.Cook
With the 99.7 release of Wireshark at least two of our internal disectors have been disabled (for lack of better term). How can I disable the disectors for "cadlock2" (port 1000) & "search agent" (port 1234) (these are the names in the display->INFO column). I've looked though the list of "enable

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build error: NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'sed'

2007-11-21 Thread Timothy.Cook
To begin with, >From the output listed it looks like your using a flavor of Visual Studio 2005 (VS 8.0). It is still recommended to use VS 6. I have not tried using VS 2005 to build Wireshark. I know that some developers on the "Wireshark-dev" list have successfully built Wireshark with VS 2005

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build error: NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'sed'

2007-10-22 Thread Timothy.Cook
Make sure you have setup your build environment per the developers guide. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diaconou, Alex Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:37 PM To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Sub

Re: [Wireshark-dev] 0.99.6 build problems on Windows

2007-10-08 Thread Timothy.Cook
For what it's worth? I just finished building Wireshark from 99.6 after performing the following (per Developers Guide): 1. MSVC v6 was installed with default setup. Installed a couple years ago. Performed today!!! 2. Install CYGWIN (just the tools specified in Dev Guide.) 3. Unzip 99.6 tarball

Re: [Wireshark-dev] 0.99.6 build problems on Windows

2007-10-08 Thread Timothy.Cook
Sorry, but I came into this thread somewhere in the middle. I didn't see the original build output where your build stops. If you have MS VC++ 6.0 installed, you don't need the SDK!!! I have been building Ethereal/Wireshark for several years now with the same MSVC installation!! The only thing I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] 0.99.6 build problems on Windows

2007-10-04 Thread Timothy.Cook
I've built Wireshark 99.6 using MSVC 6. When I updated the Wireshark source tree from 99.2, I needed to update some of the CYGWIN utilities. I also have Python 2.3 & 2.4 installed. Make sure you've followed the steps for a new source tree. (ie. verify the tool set, dist clean, make) I buil