On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can imagine that reviewing a 360kB patch takes a while. Together with
> the
> other patches in the queue, that is a lot of work we mostly do in our spare
> time.
>
Sorry, I didn't mean to rush anyone. I just wanted to
I submitted a new dissector for the WiMAX OFDMA PHY SAP protocol early last
week and I haven't received any feedback on it yet.
For reference, it's bug 2695:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2695
--
Steve Croll
___
Wireshark-dev mailin
Martin Mathieson wrote:
> Have you looked at this new submission in detail, or tried it out?
>Does it handle anything that is missing from the current one we have,
> or handle something in a better way?
> I don't actually work with WiMAX, and haven't asked colleagues who
> do to play with this n
Martin Mathieson wrote:
> This dissector has already been useful to us, thanks again for posting it.
>
You're welcome.
> (2) I'd probably add more expert items to report more things like:
> - length fields not being consistent with that implied by type of TLV
> - unknown tlv codes
>
Wen Cheng wrote:
> Great job Stephen. I'm a wimax tester, I really like your tool. But I
> think the display pattern of TLVs is not very good from a tester point
> of view. May I help to do some improvment work?
What specifically don't you like? Can you provide examples of how
TLVs are currently
How about the following workaround? Please note that I do not have access
to a Windows development environment, but this patch has been tested
on a Fedora 7 Linux host.
pika.localdomain:~/mobileMetrics/wireshark/svnWork/latest 0:22> svn diff
Index: plugins/wimaxasncp/packet-wimaxasncp.c
=
Just checking on the submission status of the WiMAX ASN Control
Protocol dissector. Is there anything further I need to do to have it
accepted/committed?
For reference, the ticket is:
Bugzilla Bug 1811 New WiMAX ASN Control Protocol (WIMAXASNCP) Dissector
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzill
