Re: [Wireshark-dev] removed functions fast way to find substitutes?

2014-11-21 Thread Semjon
Am 21.11.2014 um 23:24 schrieb Pascal Quantin: > > > 2014-11-21 17:34 GMT+01:00 Semjon <mailto:semgo-S0/gaf8t...@public.gmane.org>>: > > > > Am 21.11.2014 um 15:42 schrieb Bill Meier: > > On 11/21/2014 9:29 AM, Pascal Quantin wrote: > &g

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.99 Qt - Display Filter Auto complete feature gone forever?

2014-11-21 Thread Semjon
Am 21.11.2014 um 10:18 schrieb Alexis La Goutte: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Semjon > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I just tried the new 1.99 version with Qt which I find over all has a >> nicer, more modern look&feel than the gtk version. >> But one

Re: [Wireshark-dev] removed functions fast way to find substitutes?

2014-11-21 Thread Semjon
Am 21.11.2014 um 15:42 schrieb Bill Meier: > On 11/21/2014 9:29 AM, Pascal Quantin wrote: >> >> >> 2014-11-21 14:06 GMT+01:00 Semjon > <mailto:semgo-S0/gaf8t...@public.gmane.org>>: >> >> >> >> >> Am 21.11.2014 um 10:06 schri

Re: [Wireshark-dev] removed functions fast way to find substitutes?

2014-11-21 Thread Semjon
Am 21.11.2014 um 10:06 schrieb Guy Harris: > > On Nov 21, 2014, at 12:48 AM, Semjon > wrote: > >> One of my current problems is with >> >> tvb_get_faked_unicode(...) >> >> which isn't available anymore. >> In my Protocol I have some Asc

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.99 Qt - Display Filter Auto complete feature gone forever?

2014-11-21 Thread Semjon
Hello, I just tried the new 1.99 version with Qt which I find over all has a nicer, more modern look&feel than the gtk version. But one thing I realised is not so good I think. In Gtk versions in the display filter field I could start to write my filter and with every separation via the "." after

[Wireshark-dev] removed functions fast way to find substitutes?

2014-11-21 Thread Semjon
Hello, I maintain a dissector for a proprietary protocol of my employer and now and then I grab me some current wireshark-sources and check if my dissector code is still compatible which - in recent times- unfortunately often it is not due to changes in the wireshark lib / API. So everytime my co

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PDB Files

2010-11-20 Thread Semjon
of that. I had problems the first time because I used MS VC 2010 EE, but then I did everything exactly like described in the link I posted and now it works. Semjon - Original Message - From: "Andreas" To: Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 11:40 AM Subject: Re: [Wiresh

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PDB Files

2010-11-20 Thread Semjon
xplicitely because it should be installed by cygwin-installer by default, but it's mentioned in point 2.2.7 Verify installed tools. There is also mentioned that you probably have to rename your link.exe. Semjon - Original Message - From: "Andreas" To: Sent: Saturday, November

[Wireshark-dev] Problem loading dissector plugin dll on Windows

2010-11-18 Thread Semjon
Hi, I'm new to wireshark development and wrote a dissector plugin for a proprietary protocol. I'm using Windows XP and MSVC2008EE. Generally the plugin is working fine, but when I copy the dissector .dll to another PC which has already installed and run Wireshark before I always get the followi