> Yes, the fields will be added to the fields struct, but when
> proto_tree_get_node_field_values() goes through the fields, it
> uses get_node_field_value() to get the actual value. This function
> returned NULL when a fields was of type FT_NONE. I committed a
> patch that makes it return "1" inst
://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py/trunk/print.c?r1=21211&r2=21210&pathrev=21211
On Jan 18, 2008 11:38 AM, Sake Blok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:48:48AM +0100, Nils wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your quick replay!
> >
> > > In
nd is not free..
Nils
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Thanks a lot for your quick replay!
> In case of the field "tcp.analysis.retransmission" I think there
> is room for improvement. Even when this field is in the packet, no
> output is given. That is because this field does not have a value.
> It is either present or not.
Is this because it's type
es are used for
that.
Regards Nils
[1] http://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/t/tcp.html
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
