Thank you John for the explanation, I thought I was doing something wrong. I
will just wait for someone to review it.
--Jorge
From: Wireshark-dev on behalf of "Mora,
Jorge via Wireshark-dev"
Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Date: Friday, August 27, 2021 at 1
, Jorge via Wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to push this fix but I don’t know what I am doing wrong and
what I need to do for this fix to be reviewed. I have not received any e-mails
that something is wrong but I did see the merge has been b
Hello,
I have been trying to push this fix but I don’t know what I am doing wrong and
what I need to do for this fix to be reviewed. I have not received any e-mails
that something is wrong but I did see the merge has been blocked.
Can anybody tell me why am I getting this merge blocked?
Thanks,
WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Jorge,
Le mar. 10 août 2021 à 16:57, Mora, Jorge via Wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> a écrit :
Hello,
I just got the latest tree bu
ora, Jorge via Wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> wrote:
Hello,
I just got the latest tree but cmake fails:
$ uname -a
Linux netapp83.linux.fake 4.18.0-240.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 23 05:13:10 EDT
2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hello,
I just got the latest tree but cmake fails:
$ uname -a
Linux netapp83.linux.fake 4.18.0-240.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 23 05:13:10 EDT
2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ git log
commit 3c5168c874c7a9cf60ae3eaa44fb982352f2628d (HEAD -> master,
upstream/master, upstream/HEAD)
Author: Jo
