Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Firebird/Interbase dissector, request for comments

2007-05-20 Thread Môshe Van der Sterre
k. Do you flag these parameters with something like "__attribute__((unused))"? If so, I'll think about that in the future. > ciao > Joerg -- Mvg Môshe van der Sterre http://www.moshe.nl/ http://www.coecu.nl/ ___ Wireshark-dev mail

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Firebird/Interbase dissector, request for comments

2007-05-08 Thread Môshe Van der Sterre
shark's memory usage grows slowly. So we have to restart it once in a few days. I don't know if I coded some memory leaks, or if this is normal for tshark (I can imagine tshark keeps some packets/data in memory?) -- Mvg Môshe van der Sterre http://www.moshe.nl/ http://www.coecu.nl/ __

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Firebird/Interbase dissector, request for comments

2007-04-16 Thread Môshe Van der Sterre
, hf_gdsdb_receive_direction, tvb, offset, 4, FALSE); offset += 4; -- Mvg Môshe van der Sterre http://www.moshe.nl/ http://www.coecu.nl/ ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Firebird/Interbase dissector, request for comments

2007-04-15 Thread Môshe Van der Sterre
hope to implement the other opcodes soon, most of the work is already done. But I have still to look at ways to generate (correct) packages for some (those not or ralely used by the current firebird package). Extensive testing with invalid packages is also on the todo list. -- Mvg Môshe van der

[Wireshark-dev] Firebird/Interbase dissector questions

2007-04-05 Thread Môshe Van der Sterre
oblem with 3 is that the information in the opcode is duplicated somewhat. What is the best/preffered way to handle this? -- Mvg Môshe van der Sterre http://www.moshe.nl/ http://www.coecu.nl/ ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org h