Re: [Wireshark-dev] On building better statistics

2022-02-15 Thread João Valverde
On 15/02/22 20:01, Jaap Keuter wrote: On 15 Feb 2022, at 13:20, João Valverde wrote: And also, it's not really correct to include IP inside ICMP as IP bytes, but that's another issue entirely. Looking at the Protocol Hierarchy statistics, only the ‘top level’ protocols are counted. So,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] On building better statistics

2022-02-15 Thread Jaap Keuter
> On 15 Feb 2022, at 13:20, João Valverde wrote: > > And also, it's not really correct to include IP inside ICMP as IP bytes, but > that's another issue entirely. Looking at the Protocol Hierarchy statistics, only the ‘top level’ protocols are counted. So, an IP header in a ICMP packet don’t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] On building better statistics

2022-02-15 Thread João Valverde
On 14/02/22 15:34, João Valverde wrote: Hi Jaap, If I understand correctly I think the numbers are correct by design. When viewing packet details the analysis is almost always on the protocol header. In this case that's what the size represents and that's what  I would expect. I don't typ