I agree,
The samba one is much more comfortable.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:07 AM Richard Sharpe
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of
> > Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our communit
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of Conduct
> (CoC) as helpful for our community.
Why? Nothing is broken at the moment, so nothing needs fixing, AFAICT.
I would suggest the following alternative a
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:56 AM Jasper Bongertz wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I know there are some USB-C 10G network adapters (and the ProfiShark 10G, of
> course), but I haven't tested any of them.
I have tested one or two of them. They run warm to hot but seem to work.
In my tests I used NVMe and
Hi Richard,
I know there are some USB-C 10G network adapters (and the ProfiShark 10G, of
course), but I haven't tested any of them. Writing that much data to disk is
something I do with small portable servers (about the size of a small shoe box)
with a FPGA based capture card.
Cheers,
Jasper
Sun
All,
As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of Conduct
(CoC) as helpful for our community.
I've always felt comfortable and welcome in the Wireshark community. But I'm a
white old man so my view may have some bias.
I propose that we adopt the "Contributor Covenant" v
