Re: [Wireshark-dev] Trying to decode a TLS 1.3 with null cipher

2020-05-05 Thread Ahmed Elsherbiny
Hi Peter, Unfortunately I am not privy to the reasons for choosing this particular cipher suite. Sorry if my questions sounds naive - I'm really not into the security domain. What would be the risks of using this implementation (with the nonce issue and half-size key)? Does it make it easier for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] Proposed changes to make tcp.ack and tcp.seq relative

2020-05-05 Thread Lee
On 5/4/20, Peter Wu wrote: > Hi all, > > A request was filed earlier to add a new "tcp.ack_rel" field to ensure > that color filters can be created that always work on the relative > sequence numbers independent of the "Relative sequence numbers" option. > Instead of adding a new field, I propose

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Proposed changes to make tcp.ack and tcp.seq relative

2020-05-05 Thread Jasper Bongertz
Hello Peter, Tuesday, May 5, 2020, 1:46:13 AM, you wrote: >> To avoid cluttering the TCP tree with redundant fields: can we only show the >> absolutes if the relatives are also displayed? I don't think it's useful to >> show the absolutes twice. > Sure! The fields will be hidden in the view, but