On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Michael Mann wrote:
> Also wanted to mention that I think Stig volunteered to add support on the
> Lua end (another area that I'm not familiar enough with to add support).
>
Yes, I will have a look at the Lua support.
--
Stig Bjørlykke
Not that I know anything about the magical world of Redhat and Fedora
packaging, but this package:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=823616 seems to
indicate a wireshark-qt rpm:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=8647809.
On 16 December 2016 at 18:46, Jeff Morr
That's the base package. Maybe link to the GUI package instead?
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/wireshark-gnome
(Red Hat hasn't, last time I checked, done anything with the Qt UI.)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> The Fedora link on our download page currently p
The Fedora link on our download page currently points to
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/wireshark
which returns a 404. Unless anyone has a better suggestion I'll change it to
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/wireshark
On 12/16/16 7:15 AM, Dario Lombardo wrote:
> Fed
If I remember correctly, I thought a lot of them required a "manual" function
(from .cnf file) whose sole purpose was to do the proto_item_append_text call.
I didn't know if because its in the .cnf file if that means the hf_ field would
be part of the template file or if you removed the "manua
2016-12-16 16:51 GMT+01:00 Michael Mann :
> If I remember correctly, I thought a lot of them required a "manual"
> function (from .cnf file) whose sole purpose was to do the
> proto_item_append_text call. I didn't know if because its in the .cnf file
> if that means the hf_ field would be part of
Hi Michael,
2016-12-16 16:14 GMT+01:00 Michael Mann :
> I've finished my work adding unit string support and converting dissectors
> to use it (There are now over 300 examples of how to use this new
> feature). I believe I was conservative in the conversion, so if anyone
> wants to check their f
Fedora ships wireshark in distribution repos. On my fedora 25, 'dnf info
wireshark' gives me version 2.2.2. Is that what you need?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
>
>
> I can’t locate the binaries for the Redhat distribution of wireshark. I
> tried getting it for Redhat Fedora but it sa
I've finished my work adding unit string support and converting dissectors to
use it (There are now over 300 examples of how to use this new feature). I
believe I was conservative in the conversion, so if anyone wants to check their
favorite dissector(s) for additional use, go right ahead. Th
I can't locate the binaries for the Redhat distribution of wireshark. I tried
getting it for Redhat Fedora but it said the link didn't exist.
Thanks,
Joe
Joseph E. Tilley III
Senior Software Engineer
L3 Communications, Link Simulation & Training
12351 Research Parkway
Orlando, FL 32826
Voice:
10 matches
Mail list logo
