Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)

2016-12-12 Thread John Dill
>Message: 1 >Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:17:11 -0500 >From: Michael Mann >To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings) >Message-ID: <158f108bd63-2eb5-5...@webstg-m08.mail.aol.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > >I thought this was a g

Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)

2016-12-12 Thread Michael Mann
I'm not sure where the line between screaming "FEATURE CREAP!" and getting the patch "right" on the first try is. A structure has been created to handle singular vs plural units and nothing else. It can certainly be expanded for things like scaling, but let's take it one step at a time. It'

Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)

2016-12-12 Thread Guy Harris
On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:18 PM, Michal Labedzki wrote: > Good idea. > I have similar problem with Bluetooth protocols. There is a lot of something > like that: > "Latency = N * 0.625 ms (1 Baseband slot)" I.e., the value of the field is the number of baseband slots, and the latency, in millisec