Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Pascal Quantin
Hi Paul, 2016-08-07 18:42 GMT+02:00 Paul Offord : > Hi Anders, > > > > Ah – I understand. I had asked Gerald about that at SF16 and he mentioned > the ability to use other pcap-ng block types. I’d like to do that in the > future, but I don’t want to tackle it yet. This wouldn’t overcome the >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Dario Lombardo
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Paul Offord wrote: > Hi Anders, > > > > Thanks for the prompt reply. I’ve read through exported_pdu.h and I don’t > understand how this helps me. Is there somewhere I can read more about > using exported_pdu functions? > > > > Thanks and regards…Paul > > > Have a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

2016-08-07 Thread Pascal Quantin
2016-08-07 18:58 GMT+02:00 João Valverde : > > > On 08/07/2016 05:23 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >>> From: João Valverde >>> Date: Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot >>> To: Developer

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

2016-08-07 Thread João Valverde
On 08/07/2016 05:23 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: João Valverde Date: Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot To: Developer support list for Wireshark Seriously, what's the point of this cr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Paul Offord
Hi Anders, Ah – I understand. I had asked Gerald about that at SF16 and he mentioned the ability to use other pcap-ng block types. I’d like to do that in the future, but I don’t want to tackle it yet. This wouldn’t overcome the problem I have anyway. So going back to the original question,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

2016-08-07 Thread Hadriel Kaplan
> -- Forwarded message -- > From: João Valverde > Date: Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > > Seriously, what's the point of this craziness when this works fine: > > $

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Anders Broman
Den 7 aug. 2016 1:11 em skrev "Paul Offord" : > > Hi Anders, > > > > Thanks for the prompt reply. I’ve read through exported_pdu.h and I don’t understand how this helps me. Is there somewhere I can read more about using exported_pdu functions? > > > > Thanks and regards…Paul Instead of writing a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

2016-08-07 Thread João Valverde
On 08/07/2016 04:02 AM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/07/2016 03:47 AM, Guy Harris wrote: Tested on an up-to-date Ubuntu 15.10 system; the test fails. The TShark build information is: TShark (Wireshark) 2.3.0 (v2.3.0rc0-230-ge32890a from master) Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs and

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Paul Offord
Hi Anders, Thanks for the prompt reply. I’ve read through exported_pdu.h and I don’t understand how this helps me. Is there somewhere I can read more about using exported_pdu functions? Thanks and regards…Paul From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Anders Broman
Den 7 aug. 2016 11:25 fm skrev "Paul Offord" : > > Hi, > > > > I’ve written a small program that converts web logs into pcap-ng files with a dummy Ethernet header You could use the exported pdu format See exported_pdu.h in epan directory. Should you need new tags for meta information those could b

[Wireshark-dev] Registering protocol details

2016-08-07 Thread Paul Offord
Hi, I've written a small program that converts web logs into pcap-ng files with a dummy Ethernet header. I'm now writing a dissector for the resulting pcap-ng file. The problem is that the number and meaning of the "columns" in the log is not predictable - it depends on the web log format set