Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

> On Aug 6, 2016, at 8:22 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Aug 6, 2016, at 7:47 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > >> It also fails on an Ubuntu 14.10 system; the TShark build information is: >> >> TShark (Wireshark) 2.3.0 (v2.3.0rc0-230-ge32890a from master) >> >> Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Comb

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

On Aug 6, 2016, at 7:47 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > It also fails on an Ubuntu 14.10 system; the TShark build information is: > > TShark (Wireshark) 2.3.0 (v2.3.0rc0-230-ge32890a from master) > > Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs and > contributors. > License GPLv2+: GNU GPL vers

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

On 08/07/2016 03:47 AM, Guy Harris wrote: Tested on an up-to-date Ubuntu 15.10 system; the test fails. The TShark build information is: TShark (Wireshark) 2.3.0 (v2.3.0rc0-230-ge32890a from master) Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs and contributors. License GPLv2+:

[Wireshark-dev] Current Lua test failures on the buildbot

Tested on an up-to-date Ubuntu 15.10 system; the test fails. The TShark build information is: TShark (Wireshark) 2.3.0 (v2.3.0rc0-230-ge32890a from master) Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs and contributors. License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

Re: [Wireshark-dev] checklicenses.py

Let me also stress that only doc/*.pod and some airpcap files have the hacky soon-to-be-removed exception. These were grandfathered in. Everything else will still cause hard builbot failures. On 08/06/2016 11:23 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/06/2016 11:01 PM, Michael Mann wrote: So is the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] checklicenses.py

On 08/06/2016 11:01 PM, Michael Mann wrote: So is the "checklicense tool" now the same between the Petri-Dish and the master buildbot? Is that the reason the master buildbot now has to "pass" (otherwise all Petri-Dish runs will fail)? Yes, that's the reason. If so, I prefer the way it used

Re: [Wireshark-dev] checklicenses.py

So is the "checklicense tool" now the same between the Petri-Dish and the master buildbot? Is that the reason the master buildbot now has to "pass" (otherwise all Petri-Dish runs will fail)? If so, I prefer the way it used to be - master buildbot (legitimately) failing, but Petri-Dish being

Re: [Wireshark-dev] checklicenses.py

On 08/06/2016 10:07 PM, Guy Harris wrote: On Aug 6, 2016, at 1:21 PM, João Valverde wrote: Done in https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16913/. Does "Removed regex to check files without an extension." mean that we are, or aren't, checking files without an extension? If it means we are

Re: [Wireshark-dev] checklicenses.py

On Aug 6, 2016, at 1:21 PM, João Valverde wrote: > Done in https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16913/. Does "Removed regex to check files without an extension." mean that we are, or aren't, checking files without an extension? If it means we aren't, should we give the few scripts that don't

Re: [Wireshark-dev] checklicenses.py

On 08/05/2016 08:17 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/05/2016 11:53 AM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/05/2016 11:50 AM, Guy Harris wrote: On Aug 5, 2016, at 3:36 AM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/05/2016 11:21 AM, Guy Harris wrote: Should we just grab some version that works and include it in

[Wireshark-dev] Documentation error in README.dissector?

Hi, README.dissector describes two accessor functions that access null terminated strings and return the string length. The document says: - gint tvb_get_nstringz(tvbuff_t *tvb, const gint offset, const guint bufsize, guint8* buffer); gint tvb_get_nstringz0(tvbuff_t *tvb, const

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Are AEAD cyphers accepted for IKEv2 decryption table?

Hi Codrut, On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:51:47AM +, Codrut Grosu wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working at a strongSwan plugin that will generate a IKEv2 > decryption table for wireshark. > > In IKEv2 decryption table(wireshark) at encryption algorithm field > there are only the following algorithms: "3D