Re: [Wireshark-dev] enum preferences vs Go Fish

2015-04-04 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 4, 2015, at 1:55 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:30 AM, wrote: >> I may have gone a little overboard, but I tried to remove all enumerated >> preferences that really should be Decode As. There were enough nuances to >> each situation, that I made them all separate

Re: [Wireshark-dev] enum preferences vs Go Fish

2015-04-04 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, wrote: > Right now there is no way to include a "Decode As" protocol list as a > specific preference of a dissector. If we add this I'm happy with a global Decode As functionality. And it may be an added feature to have this in the preferences for TCP and UDP too.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] enum preferences vs Go Fish

2015-04-04 Thread mmann78
Right now there is no way to include a "Decode As" protocol list as a specific preference of a dissector. I thought I may get some resistance here because I broke "backwards compatibility", but I thought the trade off of more easily adding dissectors to a Decode As list and having an "overall"

Re: [Wireshark-dev] enum preferences vs Go Fish

2015-04-04 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:30 AM, wrote: > I may have gone a little overboard, but I tried to remove all enumerated > preferences that really should be Decode As. There were enough nuances to > each situation, that I made them all separate patches. > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/7901 (P_MUL