On Apr 4, 2015, at 1:55 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:30 AM, wrote:
>> I may have gone a little overboard, but I tried to remove all enumerated
>> preferences that really should be Decode As. There were enough nuances to
>> each situation, that I made them all separate
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, wrote:
> Right now there is no way to include a "Decode As" protocol list as a
> specific preference of a dissector.
If we add this I'm happy with a global Decode As functionality.
And it may be an added feature to have this in the preferences for TCP
and UDP too.
Right now there is no way to include a "Decode As" protocol list as a specific
preference of a dissector.
I thought I may get some resistance here because I broke "backwards
compatibility", but I thought the trade off of more easily adding dissectors to
a Decode As list and having an "overall"
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:30 AM, wrote:
> I may have gone a little overboard, but I tried to remove all enumerated
> preferences that really should be Decode As. There were enough nuances to
> each situation, that I made them all separate patches.
>
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/7901 (P_MUL