Re: [Wireshark-dev] extcap grammar for checkbox treeview

2014-09-22 Thread Tomasz Moń
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Michal Labedzki wrote: > Ok, so it is only additional filtering on specified interface. It is fine. > > By the way: do you have a plan to add some extcap tool or support into > libpcap for usbpcap? It will be fine if user will have USB sniffing on > Windows by def

Re: [Wireshark-dev] extcap grammar for checkbox treeview

2014-09-22 Thread Michal Labedzki
Ok, so it is only additional filtering on specified interface. It is fine. By the way: do you have a plan to add some extcap tool or support into libpcap for usbpcap? It will be fine if user will have USB sniffing on Windows by defaults (out-of-box). On 22 September 2014 09:18, Tomasz Moń wrote:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] extcap grammar for checkbox treeview

2014-09-22 Thread Tomasz Moń
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Michal Labedzki wrote: > It seems that you try to move some interfaces from interfaces list to > one of interface. Why do not you add as much interfaces as you need? > It seems to be similar case with Android: There is one devices (phone) > connected by USB to comp

Re: [Wireshark-dev] extcap grammar for checkbox treeview

2014-09-22 Thread Michal Labedzki
Hello Tomasz, Thanks for this patch, but I have a question: It seems that you try to move some interfaces from interfaces list to one of interface. Why do not you add as much interfaces as you need? It seems to be similar case with Android: There is one devices (phone) connected by USB to compute