-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Cox
>Sent: Aug 9, 2014 4:05 PM
>To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to support wireshark w/o having an OpenID
>
>On 09/08/14 12:51, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> My question is rather, whether it is mandatory to register
2014-08-10 16:56 GMT+02:00 Maynard, Chris :
> Other possibilities?
>
>
>
> 1.Disable the auto-update feature if Wireshark is running on Windows
> XP.
>
> 2.Leave the auto-update enabled, but have it only check against the
> latest 1.10.x version (if possible)?
>
> 3.Since Wireshark 1.1
Other possibilities?
1.Disable the auto-update feature if Wireshark is running on Windows XP.
2.Leave the auto-update enabled, but have it only check against the latest
1.10.x version (if possible)?
3.Since Wireshark 1.12.x still works on Windows XP, possibly change the
message fr
> On Aug 10, 2014, at 7:06, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
> Hi Evan,
>
> 2014-08-10 4:41 GMT+02:00 Evan Huus :
>> http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Clang%20Code%20Analysis/builds/2911/steps/check-abi/logs/stdio
>>
>> I took a quick look at the recent check-abi buildbot failure, which
>> a
On 10 August 2014 02:55, Evan Huus wrote:
> Per this comment, seems like it would be a good idea:
>
> https://blog.wireshark.org/2014/07/wireshark-1-12-officially-released/comment-page-1/#comment-3385
>
> Don't know much about the Windows installer though, this may not be
> possible?
>
>From the
Hi Evan,
2014-08-10 4:41 GMT+02:00 Evan Huus :
> http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Clang%20Code%20Analysis/builds/2911/steps/check-abi/logs/stdio
>
> I took a quick look at the recent check-abi buildbot failure, which
> appears to be manpage related:
>
> wireshark.pod around line 3525:
