> A few months ago we discussed migrating from SVN to Git + Gerrit. I
> managed to get Gerrit[1] sandbox up and running at
>
> http://test.code.wireshark.org/review/
will this Git be kept in sync with SVN trunk? Or will it be just a snapshot for
the time we're testing this system?
--
---> D
Guy Harris skrev 2013-09-18 23:28:
On Sep 14, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
Jeff Morriss skrev 2013-09-13 23:12:
tools/make-tap-reg.py
Anders Broman
I don't remember writing this
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?revision=27489&view=revision
The log message was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thess quick start instructions assume that you know about git, that you
already have an ssh key pair configured and that ssh and git are installed on
your computer. Note that the email configured in git must match the email
that you used in the Gerr
It should be fixed.
On 9/18/13 12:44 PM, Christopher Maynard wrote:
> Help -> Check for updates...
>
> https://www.wireshark.org/update/relnotes/wireshark-1.10.2.html
>
> The webpage cannot be found
> HTTP 404
>Most likely causes:
> There might be a typing error in the address.
> If yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/18/2013 03:54 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> A few months ago we discussed migrating from SVN to Git + Gerrit. I managed
> to get Gerrit[1] sandbox up and running at
>
> http://test.code.wireshark.org/review/
>
> Feel free to try it out and create
A few months ago we discussed migrating from SVN to Git + Gerrit. I
managed to get Gerrit[1] sandbox up and running at
http://test.code.wireshark.org/review/
Feel free to try it out and create as many test accounts and pull
requests as you like. You can find a quick introduction at
http://te
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Gilbert Ramirez wrote:
> I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works.
> Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file.
>
> I don't remember the others, though.
...
> tools/ftsanity.py
>
> Gilbert Ramirez
--
On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> We have the following tools in our source tree without appropriate
> license headers,
There's also tools/make-dissector-reg.py, which was written by Gilbert Ramirez:
r2873 | gram | 2001-01-10 23:21:35 -0800 (Wed, 10 Jan 2001) | 8 lines
On Sep 14, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Jeff Morriss skrev 2013-09-13 23:12:
>> tools/make-tap-reg.py
>>
>> Anders Broman
>>
> I don't remember writing this
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?revision=27489&view=revision
The log message was
Replace the clists wi
Help -> Check for updates...
https://www.wireshark.org/update/relnotes/wireshark-1.10.2.html
The webpage cannot be found
HTTP 404
Most likely causes:
There might be a typing error in the address.
If you clicked on a link, it may be out of date.
What you can try:
Retype the ad
I guess I like the overall setup of the solution file and the ability to jump
between tshark and Wireshark easily without opening new files. I don't believe
the "setup Windows development" steps (which I thought were very good) mention
supporting building Wireshark through the solution file, i
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Morriss
wrote:
> On 09/16/13 19:58, Evan Huus wrote:
>>
>> I did a bit of work on this, and there are now 31 files remaining.
>>
>> Some of them (see my recent email on unlicensed tools) appear to be
>> just oversights that will involve tracking down and emai
On 09/18/13 01:12, Gilbert Ramirez wrote:
I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still
works. Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file.
I don't remember the others, though.
Can you check the svn logs? It would appear to me (from those logs)
that you author
On 09/16/13 19:58, Evan Huus wrote:
I did a bit of work on this, and there are now 31 files remaining.
Some of them (see my recent email on unlicensed tools) appear to be
just oversights that will involve tracking down and emailing the
original author. Others just have a header that is
non-stand
On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 22:51, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> why not load directly the executable in Visual as described here:
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Tips ? It works pretty well and does
> not require an obsolete pro
On 17 September 2013 22:51, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> why not load directly the executable in Visual as described here:
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Tips ? It works pretty well and
> does not require an obsolete project file.
>
>
> Le 17/09/2013 23:45, mman...@netscape.n
16 matches
Mail list logo
