Re: [Wireshark-dev] Code sharing between TLS and DTLS

On 7/4/2013 2:30 PM, Evan Huus wrote: There should be a way to refactor such that the hf_ fields are parameters, so that each user (ssl, dtls, etc) gets their own set of filter names. yes of course this can be done. I just don't know if this is really necessary. The Wireshark user will likely

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Code sharing between TLS and DTLS

There should be a way to refactor such that the hf_ fields are parameters, so that each user (ssl, dtls, etc) gets their own set of filter names. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote: >> I am writing this to the mailing list to get some opinions if this is >> the right approach for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Code sharing between TLS and DTLS

> I am writing this to the mailing list to get some opinions if this is > the right approach for this problem or if it should stay like it is now. > If I get positive feedback I will try to make dtls use more code from > the ssl dissector. The DTLS code was created from a copy of the SSL code some

Re: [Wireshark-dev] BUg report

On 4 July 2013 13:37, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > Hi, > > There is a bugzilla : https://bugs.wireshark.org > > Regards, > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Miguel Quintana < > miguel.quint...@sixbell.com> wrote: > >> Dear Dev. Support: >> >> ** ** >> >> I want to know where can I report a bu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] BUg report

Hi, There is a bugzilla : https://bugs.wireshark.org Regards, On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Miguel Quintana wrote: > Dear Dev. Support: > > ** ** > > I want to know where can I report a bug for wireshark (windows 32b last > version). > > If there’s a bugzilla or something like that

[Wireshark-dev] BUg report

Dear Dev. Support: I want to know where can I report a bug for wireshark (windows 32b last version). If there's a bugzilla or something like that. Best regards. Miguel Quintana P. Soporte Valor Agregado T: (+56 2) 2200 1200 Anexo: 449 miguel.quint...@sixbell.com [