There is a similar problem in packet-ipv6.c: Some people want to be able to
search for ip.version (as opposed to ipv6.version) and still get a match if
version == 6. I'd like to see a "proper" solution, but if you don't come up
with one, look there for an alternative.
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg
Hi,
Thus wrote Joerg Mayer (jma...@loplof.de):
> I'm receiving coverity reports via email. Unfortunately I don't really have
> the time to look at them most of the time.
> What I might do if there is interest in it: I could open a bug for each
> dissector and copy the contents into the bug.
> Op
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> On 06/14/13 09:35, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Jeff Morriss
>> wrote:
>>> On 06/13/13 20:46, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Richard Sharpe
wrote:
> I thought I would
On 06/14/13 09:35, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Jeff Morriss
> wrote:
>> On 06/13/13 20:46, Guy Harris wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 13, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Richard Sharpe
>>> wrote:
>>>
I thought I would try to work around my issue with smb.time vs
smb2.time by u
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> On 06/13/13 20:46, Guy Harris wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Richard Sharpe
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I thought I would try to work around my issue with smb.time vs
>>> smb2.time by using a custom column field and putting in an expressio
On 06/13/13 20:46, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
I thought I would try to work around my issue with smb.time vs
smb2.time by using a custom column field and putting in an expression,
but it seems not to work. An expression that is acceptable in the
Filte
Hi,
I'm receiving coverity reports via email. Unfortunately I don't really have
the time to look at them most of the time.
What I might do if there is interest in it: I could open a bug for each
dissector and copy the contents into the bug.
Opinions?
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer
