[Wireshark-dev] Interested in GSOC idea: Packet Editor (CLI)

2013-04-15 Thread Kay
I am a graduate student from University of Science and Technology of China. My previous projects and research focus on accelerating high-speed network processing(10Gbps) with multicore/manycore architecture. My previous projects include building a high-performance HTTP parser, a TCP lookup algorith

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage

2013-04-15 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 15, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Sonny Tavernier wrote: > I worked on a proposal for the project "Improved Fuzzing": an improved > fuzzing function which aims to improve the efficiency and the coverage of the > tests. > > The more the input trace files are diverse and varied, the more it will be

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage

2013-04-15 Thread Sonny Tavernier
> I'm not familiar with PIN but I from your proposal I understand it's > something like the valgrind framework? The idea is certainly an > interesting one, though if my understanding is correct it sounds like > an awful lot of work for one summer - I could be wrong though. Thank you for your quic

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [GSoC] Packet Editor and Viewer

2013-04-15 Thread Edwin Abraham
Sorry for the mess in the previous mail. Here is the link to the GUI jpeg packet-editor-UI.jpg On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Edwin Abraham wrote: > I agree on the confusion. The initial thought when I saw the p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage

2013-04-15 Thread Evan Huus
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sonny Tavernier wrote: > Hi Evan, > > I worked on a proposal for the project "Improved Fuzzing": an improved > fuzzing function which aims to improve the efficiency and the coverage of > the tests. > > The more the input trace files are diverse and varied, the more

[Wireshark-dev] Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage

2013-04-15 Thread Sonny Tavernier
Hi Evan, I worked on a proposal for the project "Improved Fuzzing": an improved fuzzing function which aims to improve the efficiency and the coverage of the tests. The more the input trace files are diverse and varied, the more it will be effective, so it seems your idea is complementary to my p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "manuf" file broken in r48844?

2013-04-15 Thread Gerald Combs
It looks like the IEEE started indenting the entries in their public listings recently, which we weren't taking into consideration. This should be fixed in r48856 in the trunk. On 4/15/13 3:57 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > All, > > (Not subscribed to -devel) > > FYI, it appears r48844 drastically tru

[Wireshark-dev] Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage

2013-04-15 Thread Evan Huus
Just a quick idea I had that I don't plan to work on in the near future. Perhaps one of the GSOC students interested in improving our fuzzing could pick this up since it is somewhat related. Our randpkt tester is great but currently only covers 22 protocols at a quick count. An easy way to extend

[Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-Dev] GSoC 2013: Improved Fuzzing

2013-04-15 Thread Ninh Khong
Dear Sirs, I am a CS student from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology. I have learnt the information regarding the GSoC project ideas and am really exciting to know about Project Improved Fuzzing of Wireshark. While I am interested in applying and joining this, I might need your clarificati

[Wireshark-dev] "manuf" file broken in r48844?

2013-04-15 Thread Phil Mayers
All, (Not subscribed to -devel) FYI, it appears r48844 drastically truncated the "manuf" file; looks like maybe it ran with empty input somewhere? We noticed this because we use the upstream as input to a checking process at our site. Perhaps that is intended - I did scan the -devel archives

[Wireshark-dev] Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13

2013-04-15 Thread Ambarisha B
Hi dev, I am a final year engineering student pursuing my bachelors in Computer Science. I was going through the GSoC'13 ideas page and found "Filebacked-tvbuffs" interesting, so I looked it up. Here's a (probably not so) short summary of what I did and understood. I'm only a novice, so if I've go

[Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013

2013-04-15 Thread Ishan Sharma
Hello! I would like to apply at Wireshark for GSoC 2013. I have checked the list of projects and interested in (and capable of doing) some of them. The project I am mainly interested in is "Wireshark for Android". I have a good android development experience and have used libpcap to develop simple