Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Evan Huus
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Ed Beroset wrote: > > > > -Original Message- >>From: Evan Huus >>Sent: Mar 17, 2013 12:09 PM >>To: Developer support list for Wireshark >>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in >>Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Ed Beroset
-Original Message- >From: Evan Huus >Sent: Mar 17, 2013 12:09 PM >To: Developer support list for Wireshark >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark >(development) on Windows-XP-x86 > >I'm still not having any luck (and I've reread >https://www.wi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Dirk Jagdmann
>> I'm still not having any luck (and I've reread >> https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html to >> no avail). I have two shells available: cygwin's bash and windows' >> cmd.exe. >> >> If I run cmd.exe and then run the vcvars32 script, I can build >> Wireshark correctly us

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Bill Meier
On 3/17/2013 12:09 PM, Evan Huus wrote: I'm still not having any luck (and I've reread https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html to no avail). I have two shells available: cygwin's bash and windows' cmd.exe. If I run cmd.exe and then run the vcvars32 script, I can build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Evan Huus
I'm still not having any luck (and I've reread https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html to no avail). I have two shells available: cygwin's bash and windows' cmd.exe. If I run cmd.exe and then run the vcvars32 script, I can build Wireshark correctly using nmake. This seem

Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values

2013-03-17 Thread David Arnold
On 14/03/2013, at 10:36 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > You could use proto_tree_add_uint64_format_value(). I ended up writing a static void foo_tree_add_timestamp( proto_tree *tree, const int hf, tvbuff_t *tvb, gint offset); which extracts the value using tvb_g

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Bill Meier
On 3/17/2013 11:00 AM, Bill Meier wrote: Basically: You have to setup the Windows cmd environment so that MSVC can be invoked from the command line. (nmake, etc) (When you then run cygwin bash to run the test scripts nmake & etc will be available). For instance: in my Windows cmd line setup c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Bill Meier
On 3/17/2013 10:30 AM, Evan Huus wrote: These are still happening occasionally. I dug out my XP-32 virtualbox instance but have not been able to reproduce. Tangentially, running the test suite from cygwin I get the following failure (after the test the build-bot keeps failing on): 5 Suite: Uni

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2013-03-17 Thread Evan Huus
These are still happening occasionally. I dug out my XP-32 virtualbox instance but have not been able to reproduce. Tangentially, running the test suite from cygwin I get the following failure (after the test the build-bot keeps failing on): 5 Suite: Unit tests 5.1 Step: exntest suite-unittests.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Drop sql-oracle dissector?

2013-03-17 Thread Evan Huus
I created a general Oracle protocol page, since I've not been able to find much to cleanly distinguish the different protocols that apparently get lumped into the Oracle family. http://wiki.wireshark.org/Oracle Dissector was removed from the source tree in r48349 after being attached (with approp