> -Original Message-
> From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
> boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Maynard, Chris
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:21 PM
> To: 'wireshark-dev@wireshark.org'
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40312: /trun
On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 8:04 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40715
>
> capture_if_dlg.c: In function ‘store_selected’:
> capture_if_dlg.c:168:12: warning: variable ‘found’ set but not used
>
On 1/25/2012 8:04 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40715
capture_if_dlg.c: In function ‘store_selected’:
capture_if_dlg.c:168:12: warning: variable ‘found’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
capture_if_dlg.c: In functio
Hi,
What would be the best way of adding the Qt files to the tarball?
Adding a Makefile.am and Makefile.common in the qt dir or add it to EXTRA_DIST
in the top makefile.am ?
Regards
Anders
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mail
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
>
>> I have had a quick look at QtShark loading a 150 Mb file is sligtly faster
>> than the GTK version(~6s vs 8s
>
> Note that the Qt version doesn't yet show a progress bar. I'm experiment
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 25 januari 2012 13:35
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] QtShark performance
On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:57 AM, And
On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
> I have had a quick look at QtShark loading a 150 Mb file is sligtly faster
> than the GTK version(~6s vs 8s
Note that the Qt version doesn't yet show a progress bar. I'm experimenting
with a different API for the progress bar, where you alw
Hi,
I have had a quick look at QtShark loading a 150 Mb file is sligtly faster than
the GTK version(~6s vs 8s but filtering takes about 3 times as long(~30s vs
~13s).
I think fixing/improving that should be a priority as that's a showstopper.
Best regards
Anders
Hi,
That works - Thanks.
Anders
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs
Sent: den 24 januari 2012 22:27
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Can't build QtShark on