On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40436
>> User: gerald
>> Date: 2012/01/11 09:00 AM
>>
>> Log:
>> Have "make-version.pl -v" update the lib
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40436
>
> User: gerald
> Date: 2012/01/11 09:00 AM
>
> Log:
> Have "make-version.pl -v" update the library revision information for
> libwireshark and libwire
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:23:21AM -, Graham Bloice wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> >
> > > I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to
> > MSBuild. This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts
> on
> > that?
> >
> > If we d
I was curious about the code being being generated by the Windows
compiler for the g_?to? macros so I used the /FAs option to generate a
listing which contained the assembly code for one of the dissectors.
Upon examining the code, I found it to be rather inefficient.
Upon poking around a bit,
On 1/10/12 2:29 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 1/10/12 2:09 PM, Balint Reczey wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/debian/wireshark-common.files b/debian/wireshark-common.files
>> index 41341be..4403c04 100644
>> --- a/debian/wireshark-common.files
>> +++ b/debian/wireshark-common.files
>> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>> /
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
>> The same goes for the "Conversation List", "IO Graph" as well as the
>> "Endpoint List". Also, following a specific conversation could be
>> tricky.
>
> That just sounds like insufficient ge
Hello,
I'm really exited to see the birth of Qt4 front-end for Wireshark !
Do you have a roadmap ?
Is it to early to propose patches ( CMake integration for example ) ?
CMake : done
Qt4 : in progress
switch to Mercurial/Git : not yet
Hsivank
_
I'm new to the list. In searching through the archives, I've noticed that
there have been several cases where people have successfully cross-compiled
Wireshark (or actually, tshark) for the Android platform. I've been attempting
to do this, but without success. Would anyone that has been succ
Balint Reczey
wrote in news:4f09f7b3.2000...@ericsson.com:
> Hi,
>
> I have run tools/git-compare-abis.sh on latest master-1.6
> (wireshark-1.6.4-21-ga6c3642).
>
> The ABI is almost totally stable [1], which is very good sign for
> plugin developers and for anyone using Wireshark's libraries.
> -Original Message-
> From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
> boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
> Sent: 11 January 2012 10:59
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2012
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to MSBuild.
> This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts on that?
If we do so, can we continue to have lists of source files in Makefile.common,
rather than, say
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, let me clarify the idea. Let's for instance say, that you want to
>>> have a graphical representation of the inner-workings of
Hi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
>
>> Ok, let me clarify the idea. Let's for instance say, that you want to
>> have a graphical representation of the inner-workings of a
>> communication of two machines.
>
> BTW, you're not
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
> Ok, let me clarify the idea. Let's for instance say, that you want to
> have a graphical representation of the inner-workings of a
> communication of two machines.
BTW, you're not thinking of something such as what you can get from the
Statistic
14 matches
Mail list logo
