Getting started writing a dissector plugin in lua, I found the examples
on the wiki to be rather esoteric. Only having previously written a
plugin in C gave me any idea where to start.
Is there any interest in including a more "ordinary" dissector example
on the wiki, or with the wireshark instal
On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, shoot. Looks like svnversion.h is removed by clean and/or dist-clean.
>>
>> So it should be generated only if you're building fro
On 11/02/2011 08:19 PM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Gerald Combs mailto:ger...@wireshark.org>> wrote:
Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release
over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down.
Is ther
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release
> over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down.
> Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point?
>
> On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:
Guy Harris wrote:
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Oh, shoot. Looks like svnversion.h is removed by clean and/or dist-clean.
So it should be generated only if you're building from SVN, and should be
included in source tarballs,
On 11/01/2011 08:44 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.4.10.
Digests
wireshark-1.4.10.tar.bz2: 20611930 bytes
MD5(wireshark-1.4.10.tar.bz2) =
d688 827a 9b99 083f d995 2c4f c0f3 410c
SHA1(wireshark-1.4.10.
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
>> Oh, shoot. Looks like svnversion.h is removed by clean and/or dist-clean.
>
> So it should be generated only if you're building from SVN, and should be
> included in source tarballs, and sho
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Oh, shoot. Looks like svnversion.h is removed by clean and/or dist-clean.
So it should be generated only if you're building from SVN, and should be
included in source tarballs, and should be removed only by maintainer-clean.
_
RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** wrote:
Hi,
While trying to compile 1.6.3 from wireshark-1.6.3.tar.bz2 on Windows,
compiler complains that i have svnversion.h missing.
Forcing
nmake -f Makefile.nmake svnversion.h
gives...
rm -f svnversion.h
perl make-version.pl
This is not a SVN
Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release
over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down.
Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point?
On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:
> So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest W
Hi,
While trying to compile 1.6.3 from wireshark-1.6.3.tar.bz2 on Windows, compiler
complains that i have svnversion.h missing.
Forcing
nmake -f Makefile.nmake svnversion.h
gives...
rm -f svnversion.h
perl make-version.pl
This is not a SVN build.
Thus, svnversion.h is not genera
Ok, let me guess further, on the first system you did also install the
default wireshark coming with the Linux distribution, and on the
second system you did not?
In any case, underneath the directory you ran make from is a lib
directory, containing the finished build for your plugin, as well as
a
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:18:53 +0100, Roland Knall
wrote:
Ok, some more information
How do you write the dissector, in epan/dissectors or as a plugin?
Which version of wireshark are you using? Just trunk, or a specific
release version (e.g. trunk-1.6)?
But my guess would be, that you either you b
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:18:53 +0100, Roland Knall
wrote:
Ok, some more information
How do you write the dissector, in epan/dissectors or as a plugin?
Which version of wireshark are you using? Just trunk, or a specific
release version (e.g. trunk-1.6)?
But my guess would be, that you either you b
Ok, some more information
How do you write the dissector, in epan/dissectors or as a plugin?
Which version of wireshark are you using? Just trunk, or a specific
release version (e.g. trunk-1.6)?
But my guess would be, that you either you built your dissector as a
plugin, or the versions of wiresh
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:11:31 +0100, Marcel Haas
wrote:
Hey
If i want to start wireshark i am geting a failur :
ERROR:packet.c:1531:heur_dissector_add: assertion failed:
(sub_dissectors != NULL)
Aborted
Somebody know how to fix it ?
You're right of course.
Regarding the issue, I checked again, it has already been fixed for
1.6.3 and the current trunk-1.6 . Had an older revision checked out.
Sorry for the mix-up
regards,
Roland
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> @Roland
>
> Well, he didn't provide much co
@Roland
Well, he didn't provide much context, so him writing to -dev leaded me
to believe he's hacking himself.
We just won't know until he tells us.
PS: what's the bug number for the bugzilla entry regarding this issue?
Thanks,
Jaap
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:28:23 +0100, Roland Knall wrote:
@
@Jaap
Normally I would agree, but if you are using 1.6.x and wireshark can
not find it's plug-ins, the message can be thrown by the openSAFETY
dissector. It is fixed in svn, and the fix for 1.6.x is waiting in
bugzilla.
regards,
Roland
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
It's a test that find_heur_dissector_list(name) returns a valid list.
In this case it returns NULL: you try to add to a subdissector list
which doesn't exist.
You need to setup the subdissector list before adding to it.
Note that display filter fields do NOT automagically become a
subdiss
Hi
Could you please just write, how you want to start wireshark? Have you
downloaded it from the net, or did you compile the svn version?
Usually the message can appear, if wireshark is not able to load the
plugins correctly. If you have compiled wireshark for Linux yourself,
you usually can avoi
Hey
If i want to start wireshark i am geting a failur :
ERROR:packet.c:1531:heur_dissector_add: assertion failed:
(sub_dissectors != NULL)
Aborted
Somebody know how to fix it ?
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest Wireshark. Looking
at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html he read the description literally
which said that the 1.6.0rc2 is the latest development release. So he figured
it might be newer than the fresh 1.6.3 release...
I think we ca
23 matches
Mail list logo
