Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38304: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-snmp.c

2011-08-03 Thread Maynard, Chris
> -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:32 AM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38304: > /

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Clang-Code-Analysis

2011-08-03 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Clang-Code-Analysis on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Clang-Code-Analysis/builds/314 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: clang-code-analysis

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Freeing memory when quitting Wireshark

2011-08-03 Thread Alex Lindberg
It turns out there where several issues.  All dealing with preferences. 1 - UAT_END_FIELD not included in the uat_field_t structure. (Did not break Linux, but windows was not so kind.) 2 - In my call to prefs_register_protocol( my_proto, callback_fn) if callback_fn was NULL, wireshark/tshark wou

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2011-08-03 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/3360 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reas

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2011-08-03 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/2600 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest SVN (r38309) doesn't compile (packet-6lowpan.c)

2011-08-03 Thread Marc Petit-Huguenin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I moved back to gcc-4.6 and the new Debian version 4.6.1-5 is now building Wireshark fine. On 08/02/2011 09:24 AM, Bill Meier wrote: > On 8/2/2011 11:19 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: >> >> I had the same exact problem when my Debian sid distribution

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2011-08-03 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/1952 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-10.04-x64 Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2011-08-03 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/3921 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Custom dissector and info column issue

2011-08-03 Thread Chris Maynard
Graham Bloice writes: > I added your dissector to my build, cut down the capture file to only include > frames 1 & 3 and attached a debugger to see what was happening. > > This might be a bug. Graham, I had come to the same conclusion. It seems like a bug to me and would suggest opening a bug

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Custom dissector and info column issue

2011-08-03 Thread Graham Bloice
On 02/08/2011 22:36, Chris Miller wrote: > Hi, > > I have come across an issue whilst attempting to write a custom dissector > for the XCP protocol. The protocol sits on top of TCP and I am using the > tcp_dissect_pdus function to handle the reassembly of TCP packets to allow > successful dissec

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit

2011-08-03 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, If you are using dissector_add() or dissector_delete() in your plugin you should replace them with the corresponding new functions dissector_add_uint dissector_delete_uint etc. Regards Anders From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit

2011-08-03 Thread sagar Guledagudda
But the signature of the function doesn't matches with the any of the function u have mentioned and if i remove that line it gives same error for dissector_add function. On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Anders Broman wrote: > ** > Hi, > Dissector_delete has been deprecated and should be replaced b

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit

2011-08-03 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Dissector_delete has been deprecated and should be replaced by one of the following functions: libwireshark.def:dissector_delete_string libwireshark.def:dissector_delete_uint libwireshark.def:heur_dissector_delete libwireshark.def:ssl_dissector_delete I suggest you run checkapi on your dissec

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit

2011-08-03 Thread sagar Guledagudda
Thanks that worked. i got the dll and tried to link it with wireshark wihch is running on 64bit machine. i am getting a linker error as " the procedure entry point dissector_delete could not be located in the dynamic link library libwireshark.dll. what may be the problem ? On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit linux

2011-08-03 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, To my knowledge Wireshark builds "out-of-the-box" on Linux-64bit e.g just do a svn checkout and build. Regards Anders From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of sagar Guledagudda Sent: den 3 augusti 201

[Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit linux

2011-08-03 Thread sagar Guledagudda
Hi, I am trying to build the wireshark on linux for target platform 64bit. what are changes should be done in make file and any other things to be done to get it compiled for 64 bit ?? Thanks and Regards Sagar ___ Sent via: