Hi,
I found out generating graphs from statistics->IO graphs, when i tried to
generate graphs with advanced version i found a row wirh label "*calc"* and
i saw options like AVG(*), SUM(*), COUNT(*), MIN(*) etc, can any body help
me understanding what they represent according to the graph ? how gr
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/3846
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86
Build Reason:
Bui
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/3315
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc
Build Reas
Right now, the remaining errors when compiling with -DSEAL are:
gtk/new_packet_list.c:836:34: error: âGtkTreeViewColumnâ has no member
named âbuttonâ
gtk/new_packet_list.c:838:3: error: âGtkTreeViewColumnâ has no member named
âbuttonâ
gtk/packet_win.c:492:45: error: âGtkDialogâ
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/3572
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis on
Wireshark (development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/1414
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: v
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/3842
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86
Build Reason:
Bui
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/2514
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 29, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
I have strengthened the heuristics in revision 37828, which seems to
really fix the problem.
Well, it fixes the problem with that *particular* capture.
The underlying problem is that proto_tree_add_item() might not end up
Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Remember that since r35145 (and probably some other revs as the kinks
got worked out), libtool-based builds only export the listed symbols.
(Hmmm, I wonder if cma
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/3405
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64
Build Reason:
Bui
On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>> Remember that since r35145 (and probably some other revs as the kinks
>> got worked out), libtool-based builds only export the listed symbols.
>> (Hmmm, I wonder if cmake has th
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Remember that since r35145 (and probably some other revs as the kinks
> got worked out), libtool-based builds only export the listed symbols.
> (Hmmm, I wonder if cmake has that same functionality.)
I know that I never did anythin
Jeff Morriss writes:
> Remember that since r35145 (and probably some other revs as the kinks
> got worked out), libtool-based builds only export the listed symbols.
> (Hmmm, I wonder if cmake has that same functionality.)
Ah, OK; I guess I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out.
___
Chris Maynard wrote:
Jeff Morriss writes:
Mariusz Okrój wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting "Couldn't load module
/home/marok/wireshark/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.6.0/xmpp.so:
/home/marok/wireshark/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.6.0/xmpp.so: undefined
symbol: tvb_find_tvb" during the wireshark startup.
What may ca
Jeff Morriss writes:
> Mariusz Okrój wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm getting "Couldn't load module
> > /home/marok/wireshark/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.6.0/xmpp.so:
> > /home/marok/wireshark/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.6.0/xmpp.so: undefined
> > symbol: tvb_find_tvb" during the wireshark startup.
> >
> > What m
Mariusz Okrój wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting "Couldn't load module
/home/marok/wireshark/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.6.0/xmpp.so:
/home/marok/wireshark/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.6.0/xmpp.so: undefined
symbol: tvb_find_tvb" during the wireshark startup.
What may cause this problem? I'm using many functions fro
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:59, Mark Whitney wrote:
>
> Is decryption of the APS layer currently supported? Or am I just
> doing something wrong?
It looks like part of the problem is that the Smart Energy Key
Establishment cluster (0x0800) is not implemented yet in the
packet-zbee-aps dissector
18 matches
Mail list logo