Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37899: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dec-dnart.c

2011-07-15 Thread Guy Harris
On Jul 15, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote: > This may be a more reliable URL to use: > >http://www.openvms.compaq.com/wizard/decnet/ Or this: http://h71000.www7.hp.com/wizard/decnet/ which reflects a corporate purchase that happened a while ago. :-) ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37899: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dec-dnart.c

2011-07-15 Thread Stephen Fisher
This may be a more reliable URL to use: http://www.openvms.compaq.com/wizard/decnet/ Than this, which looks like a mirror: http://linux-decnet.sourceforge.net/docs/doc_index.html On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:01:40PM +, g...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/v

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS (with revised instructions)

2011-07-15 Thread Guy Harris
On Jul 13, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > I'm working on getting the script to work; I'll check it in, along with the > patches, when I have it working. OK, I've checked them in. I called the script "macosx-setup.sh". > The patches should probably be checked into a subdirectory I did

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37833: /trunk/ /trunk/docbook/: release-notes.xml /trunk/gtk/: capture_file_dlg.c /trunk/: packet-range.c /trunk/win32/: file_dlg_win32.c

2011-07-15 Thread Maynard, Chris
Yes, I reverted it in r37839: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=37839 Sake had a better patch that he was working on and posted on -core as save-as.diff. My understanding is that the patch would only work for non-Windows platforms though, so I think all we need n

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37833: /trunk/ /trunk/docbook/: release-notes.xml /trunk/gtk/: capture_file_dlg.c /trunk/: packet-range.c /trunk/win32/: file_dlg_win32.c

2011-07-15 Thread Stephen Fisher
This doesn't seem to be working - did it get reverted? On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 04:31:50PM +, cmayn...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=37833 > > User: cmaynard > Date: 2011/06/29 09:31 AM > > Log: > Based on user feedback from Sharkfe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] error in epan/tfs.h

2011-07-15 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
Hi, On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 08:34:48PM +0530, sagar sg wrote: >I am getting the following error during the compilation of the dissector > on linux platform, does anybody know the cause for this error and solution ?? > /wireshark/wireshark-1.4.7/epan/ftypes/ftypes.h:263: error: expected > cons

Re: [Wireshark-dev] error in epan/tfs.h

2011-07-15 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 08:34:48PM +0530, sagar sg wrote: >I am getting the following error during the compilation of the > dissector on linux platform, does anybody know the cause for this > error and solution ?? please reply. > /wireshark/wireshark-1.4.7/epan/ftypes/ftypes.h:263: error: e

[Wireshark-dev] error in epan/tfs.h

2011-07-15 Thread sagar sg
Hi, I am getting the following error during the compilation of the dissector on linux platform, does anybody know the cause for this error and solution ?? please reply. /wireshark/wireshark-1.4.7/epan/ftypes/ftypes.h:263: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before âu /w

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38028: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-icmp.c

2011-07-15 Thread Sake Blok
On 15 jul 2011, at 02:34, Maynard, Chris wrote: >> Log: >> If the first 8 bytes of the icmp echo/echo-reply data look like a >> timestamp, dissect it as a timestmap and calculate the time since the icmp >> packet was created. >> > > Sake, now that you've dug into timestamps for ICMP echo/echo-re

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38038: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-icmp.c

2011-07-15 Thread Sake Blok
On 15 jul 2011, at 04:39, cmayn...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38038 > > User: cmaynard > Date: 2011/07/14 07:39 PM > > Log: > Be sure there's enough bytes in the ICMP payload before trying to access it in > order to try to determine if