Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugins to builtins

2011-06-19 Thread Roland Knall
Hi Personally, I would prefer changing more or all plugins into built-in dissectors. It would help those dissectors, who have to use functionality only provided by a plug-in, as the whole openSAFETY-SercosIII mix-up showed. My next favorite would be the ProfiNet plug-in. If no one else would like

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

2011-06-19 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/3051 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Tony Trinh
XCode 3.x is free while 4 is not. You need to register with Apple to download 3.x. See the link below for more info. http://guide.macports.org/chunked/installing.xcode.html I'm also a big fan of MacPorts (which is more current than Fink). __

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37714: /trunk/ /trunk/: README.macos

2011-06-19 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 19, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote: > you are just too fast... Thanks for going ahead. Should the README.macos have a link to your page, or a copy of the information on that page? Or should it go into the Developer's Guide? > One note: Is XCode still included on the install dis

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37714: /trunk/ /trunk/: README.macos

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Tüxen
Hi Guy, you are just too fast... Thanks for going ahead. One note: Is XCode still included on the install discs or do I need to buy it in the App Store? At least in Europe it is sold for EUR 3.99? (Or you need a developer account)... Just wondering. Best regards Michael On Jun 19, 2011, at 7:34 P

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Jun 19, 2011, at 7:46 PM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote: > I'm using MacPorts (http://www.macports.org/) which works very well. I did not want to install anything not being necessary on the machines used as buildbots. That is why I'm not using any kind of package manager (MacPorts/Fink/Whatever) on them

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Jun 19, 2011, at 7:28 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote: > >> After that you can follow the instructions at >> https://nplab.fh-muenster.de/groups/wiki/wiki/fb7a4/Building_Wireshark_on_SnowLeopard.html > > Do you need to install Cairo? Unlike ATK, Pa

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
I'm using MacPorts (http://www.macports.org/) which works very well. It's easy to install needed libraries and follow updates. -- Stig Bjørlykke ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 19, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote: > After that you can follow the instructions at > https://nplab.fh-muenster.de/groups/wiki/wiki/fb7a4/Building_Wireshark_on_SnowLeopard.html Do you need to install Cairo? Unlike ATK, Pango, gdk-pixbuf, and GTK+, Cairo comes with Snow Leopard, a

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on Windows-7-x64

2011-06-19 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/19 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: Build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Jun 19, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > Hello, > > my wife just got herself a Macbook and now I'd like to build WS on that > system. I managed to check out the source, but when I tried to run > autogen.sh it complained about missing libtool. I'm convinced that this > is not the only thi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugins to builtins

2011-06-19 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I'm not sure if we want to convert all plugins to builtin ones but the asn1 plugin should stay as a plugin and I would think at least one more simple one as a plugin example. More comments any one? Regards Anders From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [ma

[Wireshark-dev] How to build on MACOS

2011-06-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello, my wife just got herself a Macbook and now I'd like to build WS on that system. I managed to check out the source, but when I tried to run autogen.sh it complained about missing libtool. I'm convinced that this is not the only thing that's missing. Trying to read README.macos didn't help (i

[Wireshark-dev] plugins to builtins

2011-06-19 Thread mmann78
Why would a plugin dissector ever be better than a builtin? I see "development speed" mentioned as a plus, but isn't the lack of "platform independent code" a much greater detriment? Is there any reason why the current plugins couldn't be converted to built-in dissectors? I dove in and conve

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Another gtk compile error (gtk_rpcstat_cb undeclared)

2011-06-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:34:01AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: > Should be fixed as of revision 37704. Thanks - also for fixing most of the warnings in menu.c! Joerg ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2011-06-19 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/2135 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Another gtk compile error (gtk_rpcstat_cb undeclared)

2011-06-19 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Should be fixed as of revision 37704. Regards Anders -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer Sent: den 18 juni 2011 01:01 To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Another gtk co