[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis

2011-04-16 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/462 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: vs

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36659: / /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.common packet-rohc.c

2011-04-16 Thread Martin Mathieson
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Anders Broman wrote: > Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-04-16 15:18: > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Anders Broman wrote: > >> Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-04-16 14:03: >> >> Hi Anders, >> There is already most of the ROHC profile in packet-pdcp-lte.c. I'd be

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36659: / /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.common packet-rohc.c

2011-04-16 Thread Anders Broman
Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-04-16 15:18: On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Anders Broman > wrote: Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-04-16 14:03: Hi Anders, There is already most of the ROHC profile in packet-pdcp-lte.c. I'd been meaning to separate it

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36659: / /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.common packet-rohc.c

2011-04-16 Thread Martin Mathieson
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Anders Broman wrote: > Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-04-16 14:03: > > Hi Anders, > There is already most of the ROHC profile in packet-pdcp-lte.c. I'd been > meaning to separate it out so that it could be used from other places (e.g. > when I create UMTS PDCP...) >

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2011-04-16 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/1565 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36659: / /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.common packet-rohc.c

2011-04-16 Thread Anders Broman
Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-04-16 14:03: Hi Anders, There is already most of the ROHC profile in packet-pdcp-lte.c. I'd been meaning to separate it out so that it could be used from other places (e.g. when I create UMTS PDCP...) Martin I missed that, how to proceed? I think the ROHC code sho

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36659: / /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.common packet-rohc.c

2011-04-16 Thread Martin Mathieson
That should have read "most of the RTP profile" On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Martin Mathieson < martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Anders, > There is already most of the ROHC profile in packet-pdcp-lte.c. I'd been > meaning to separate it out so that it could be used from other p

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2011-04-16 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/2474 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reas

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36659: / /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.common packet-rohc.c

2011-04-16 Thread Martin Mathieson
Hi Anders, There is already most of the ROHC profile in packet-pdcp-lte.c. I'd been meaning to separate it out so that it could be used from other places (e.g. when I create UMTS PDCP...) Martin On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:44 PM, wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2011-04-16 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2857 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

2011-04-16 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/2392 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] HTTP header truncated

2011-04-16 Thread Alexander Koeppe
Am 16.04.2011 10:23, schrieb Sake Blok: > On 16 apr 2011, at 09:40, Anders Broman wrote: >> First time I saw it - [Truncated] i found it a bit ambiguous perhaps it >> should say >> [Display Truncated] even if that's a bit longish. > > Or we should put the [truncated] at the end instead of the beg

Re: [Wireshark-dev] HTTP header truncated

2011-04-16 Thread Anders Broman
Sake Blok skrev 2011-04-16 10:23: On 16 apr 2011, at 09:40, Anders Broman wrote: First time I saw it - [Truncated] i found it a bit ambiguous perhaps it should say [Display Truncated] even if that's a bit longish. Or we should put the [truncated] at the end instead of the beginning? Than it i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] HTTP header truncated

2011-04-16 Thread Sake Blok
On 16 apr 2011, at 09:40, Anders Broman wrote: > First time I saw it - [Truncated] i found it a bit ambiguous perhaps it > should say > [Display Truncated] even if that's a bit longish. Or we should put the [truncated] at the end instead of the beginning? Than it is also not to bad to make it lo

Re: [Wireshark-dev] HTTP header truncated

2011-04-16 Thread Anders Broman
Alexander Koeppe skrev 2011-04-16 02:53: Am 16.04.2011 02:37, schrieb Sake Blok: On 16 apr 2011, at 02:10, Alexander Koeppe wrote: But you maybe also know vendor's support people. If they see a "truncated" they even don't believe anything. If they see nothing, they believe everything. I'll go