Re: [Wireshark-dev] Short question for modus operandi

Hi On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Chris Maynard wrote: > Roland Knall writes: > >> I have provided some time ago a patch for submission into wireshark >> (Bug #5753). Over the course of the next two weeks a new version of >> this patch would be completed, which would enable the dissector to >>

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/1551 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.5.1 has wrong release date

Fixed. Thanks! On 4/13/11 6:03 PM, Christopher Maynard wrote: > FYI: http://www.wireshark.org/ still indicates the previous January 24, 2011 > release date for Wireshark 1.5.0. > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing lis

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.5.1 has wrong release date

FYI: http://www.wireshark.org/ still indicates the previous January 24, 2011 release date for Wireshark 1.5.0. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

Thanks for the responses, I sincerely appreciate it. I was able to build lemon for my host machine, and compile the majority of the project. My goal is to get libwireshark working on Android as a shared library. It seems to build successfully as a static library, so I am going to try build it as

[Wireshark-dev] packet reassembly

Dear all, I'm trying to implement reassembly of DVB-CI link layer packages. Finally, I got to a point where the code is working but I'm not sure if I understand it well enough. Therefore, I'd like your comments before I submit a patch. The DVB-CI link layer (lpdu) is fairly simple: 1 byte "tr

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Clang-Code-Analysis

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Clang-Code-Analysis on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Clang-Code-Analysis/builds/58 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: clang-code-analysis

[Wireshark-dev] HTTP reassemble and clear text displaying question

Dear all I have a question in the wireshark source code: If I have HTTP trace of libpcap format, I found wireshark can perfectly reassemble the HTTP response data and parse its content(e.g. HTML) in clear text. Can some one suggest me which src file(s) or part of functions achieve thi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Guy Harris wrote: > Of course, none of that addresses any configuration tests we might do that > involve compiling *and* running code; if we do any of that, cross-compilation > is even harder to make work. And we do, in fact, do tests such as that. For example, we

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:27 AM, George Nychis wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jeff Morriss >> wrote: >> George Nychis wrote: >> BTW, it appears that this has come up before in the past (2009): >> https://$1.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200910/msg00123.html >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

Hi Jeff, I am on Revision: 36615 So it seems like I am past that revision. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > George Nychis wrote: > >> BTW, it appears that this has come up before in the past (2009): >> https://$1.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200910/msg00123.html <

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36622: /trunk/tools/ /trunk/tools/: fuzz-test.sh test-fuzzed-cap.sh

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:36:13PM +, morr...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=36622 > Export MALLOC_OPTIONS=AJ to increase memory allocation debug on > FreeBSD (and others). > (I don't have easy access to either of these OS so this h

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/435 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: vs

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

George Nychis wrote: BTW, it appears that this has come up before in the past (2009): https://$1.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200910/msg00123.html but it doesn't seem like a resolution was made.. but this post has a sh

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 36614: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-snmp.c /trunk/asn1/snmp/: packet-snmp-template.c

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:57:35AM +0200, Stig Bjørlykke wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, wrote: > > Log: > >  Fix Coverity 1047: UNUSED_VALUE in dissect_smux > > I don't think this is the correct fix, because now the > proto_item_add_subtree() has no function. I think maybe smux_tree

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Short question for modus operandi

Roland Knall writes: > I have provided some time ago a patch for submission into wireshark > (Bug #5753). Over the course of the next two weeks a new version of > this patch would be completed, which would enable the dissector to > talk Modbus/TCP as well. But this version would be very prelimina

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

BTW, it appears that this has come up before in the past (2009): https://$1.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200910/msg00123.html but it doesn't seem like a resolution was made.. but this post has a short-term workaround: http://seclists.org/wireshark/2009/Oct/286 I am going to try this out, t

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/1542 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] how to cross-compile tshark and tools

Hi all, I am trying to cross-compile tshark for an arm system, but I am hitting an issue I am not sure how to overcome. I have added my gcc cross-compiler to my path, and configured my system as: ./configure -host=arm-eabi --disable-wireshark --with-pcap=no I succeed in building several of the c

[Wireshark-dev] Short question for modus operandi

Hello I have provided some time ago a patch for submission into wireshark (Bug #5753). Over the course of the next two weeks a new version of this patch would be completed, which would enable the dissector to talk Modbus/TCP as well. But this version would be very preliminary, and not stable for a