Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-24 Thread Martin Kaiser
Hello Bill, Guy, Thus wrote Martin Kaiser (li...@kaiser.cx): > Thus wrote Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu): > > > 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual > > > data. > > > I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just > > > part > > > of the capture

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Splitting one packet into multiple packets

2011-02-24 Thread Roland Knall
Hi Yes, that is exactly what I want to see. Let me explain for a second. I work for a company, developing SPS systems for machines. One of our system uses a so called "Bus Controller" which communicates using a Realtime Ethernet Protocol like Sercos III oder Powerlink V2. "Behind" this Controller

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Splitting one packet into multiple packets

2011-02-24 Thread David Aggeler
Roland, Do you want to see the following: -- FRAME 1 -- ETHERNET II FRAME -- IP FRAME -- UDP FRAME -- MY PROTOCOL FRAME 1/4 -- FRAME 1 -- ETHERNET II FRAME -- IP FRAME -- UDP FRAME -- MY PROTOCOL FRAME 2/4 etc? Why that? Do yo have a post processing step that relies on this? wireshark is a p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Yoda style conditions

2011-02-24 Thread Jeff Morriss
Steffen DETTMER wrote: (OT, sorry for my noise on the list) Well, it IS a development discussion, so I'm not sure it's completely OT. Also, I think for NULL pointers this is much more easy than to check for possibly deleted pointers (or otherwise stale pointers or copies of pointers realloc'd

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Yoda style conditions (was: Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 35975: /trunk/epan/dfilter/ /trunk/epan/dfilter/: dfilter-macro.c dfilter.c)

2011-02-24 Thread Steffen DETTMER
(OT, sorry for my noise on the list) Hi, thanks a lot for your explanations and regarding the non-buggy/buggy analyzers. I'm sorry to ask again an OT but I'm not sure if I understood correctly your explanation regarding `if(pointer)'-checks in general for `mandatory' pointers. Also it could be t

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2011-02-24 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/2110 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reas

[Wireshark-dev] Splitting one packet into multiple packets

2011-02-24 Thread Roland Knall
Hello I have the following situation. The trace identifies (correctly) packets I am interested in. These packets come from a device, which collects packets, puts them together into one udp frame, and sends them over the network. Right now I trace the udp payload, and call the packet dissector for

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2011-02-24 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2450 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui