Re: [Wireshark-dev] Static analysis added to the buildbot

2011-02-16 Thread Bill Meier
On 2/16/2011 11:42 PM, Guy Harris wrote: What's the default process stack size in Win32? ==>From the VC2008 docs[1]: The /STACK option sets the size of the stack in bytes. Use this option only when you build an .exe file. The reserve value specifies the total stack allocation in virtual m

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Static analysis added to the buildbot

2011-02-16 Thread Guy Harris
What's the default process stack size in Win32? The MSVC++ static analyzer is giving some c:\buildbot\...\blahblahblah.c(XXX) : warning C6262: Function uses 'YYY' bytes of stack: exceeds /analyze:stacksize'16384'. Consider moving some data to heap but we're just running the static anal

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Static analysis added to the buildbot

2011-02-16 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 15, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > The trunk buildbot now has two additional buildslaves: one that runs the > C/C++ code analyzer in Visual Studio 10 Premium and one that runs the > Clang Static Analyzer. They are scheduled to run once a day at 9:00 PM > PST (5:00 AM UTC) for the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Static analysis added to the buildbot

2011-02-16 Thread Gerald Combs
On 2/16/11 3:22 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:33:02PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote: Scan-build creates very large (about 3 GB uncompressed) HTML reports. I'm hoping to have them available for download in the next day or so. That directory should be suitable for hosting on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows 7 x64 compilation.

2011-02-16 Thread Daryl Yu
I'm not sure, but this might be what you're looking for: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Win64 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Bhuvan Vijayvergiya wrote: > Hi, > > My team is using wireshark while testing our product. We have some custom > dissector plugins coded for that purpose and used

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Static analysis added to the buildbot

2011-02-16 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:33:02PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote: > Scan-build creates very large (about 3 GB uncompressed) HTML reports. > I'm hoping to have them available for download in the next day or so. That directory should be suitable for hosting on a web server for us to all browse.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods

2011-02-16 Thread Andreas
Am 16.02.2011 17:57, schrieb Stephen Fisher: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Andreas wrote: This might be easy. If all .obj files that are linked in the directory epan you can do cd epan dumpbin /symbols *.obj | find /v "UNDEF" | find "External" sfisher@shadow:/usr/local/sr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libwireshark.lib is missing someproto_registrar_* methods

2011-02-16 Thread Jim Young
>Stephen Fisher 02/16/11 11:57 AM >>> >> . On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Andreas wrote: >> This might be easy. If all .obj files that are linked in the directory >> epan you can do >> >>cd epan >>dumpbin /symbols *.obj | find /v "UNDEF" | find "External" > sfisher@shadow:/us

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods

2011-02-16 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Andreas wrote: > This might be easy. If all .obj files that are linked in the directory > epan you can do > >cd epan >dumpbin /symbols *.obj | find /v "UNDEF" | find "External" sfisher@shadow:/usr/local/src/wireshark>cd epan sfisher@shadow:/usr/

[Wireshark-dev] Windows 7 x64 compilation.

2011-02-16 Thread Bhuvan Vijayvergiya
Hi, My team is using wireshark while testing our product. We have some custom dissector plugins coded for that purpose and used to compile and distribute the installer for others to use. Up until now we have been using the 32 bit version, but now we want to move to the 64 bit version. I am quite f

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC: Should ip.addr also match on ARP packets

2011-02-16 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:58:54AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > > > I've created a small patch that will allow ip.addr to match on arp > > requests/replies as well as the previous stuff. It comes quite handy > > but as this kind of thing is a bit

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC: Should ip.addr also match on ARP packets

2011-02-16 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > I've created a small patch that will allow ip.addr to match on arp > requests/replies as well as the previous stuff. It comes quite handy > but as this kind of thing is a bit unusual I thought I'd ask first. > There is precedence for matching on

[Wireshark-dev] RFC: Should ip.addr also match on ARP packets

2011-02-16 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello, I've created a small patch that will allow ip.addr to match on arp requests/replies as well as the previous stuff. It comes quite handy but as this kind of thing is a bit unusual I thought I'd ask first. There is precedence for matching on another dissector's fields with ipv6 matching on ip