Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

Hello Bill, Guy, Thus wrote Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu): > > 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual > > data. > > I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just > > part > > of the captured data (similar to the code in your original patch). > >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods

Andreas wrote: Am 11.02.2011 00:06, schrieb Guy Harris: > They weren't omitted on purpose. They were probably omitted because > they were added by a UN*X user; by default, UN*X dynamic shared > libraries export every non-static symbol, unlike Windows DLLs. I think this is a strong argument to

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/1908 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason: Bui