Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems Compiling under Visual Studio 2010

Thanks Stephen. Worked perfect ... all compiled. David -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 11:14 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Prepartion for migration from GTK+ 2.x to GTK+ 3

Thanks to everyone who has fixed the typos in some of my commits for doing the -DGSEAL_ENABLE cleanup. After hundreds of changes, my eyes start to glaze over and miss things :). I'm not done yet, but hopefully most of the way there!

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems Compiling under Visual Studio 2010

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:46:56PM -0500, David Culp wrote: > Anyone have the following compile problem (using Visual 2010 Ultimate) > graph_analysis.c(1450): error C2039: 'allocation' : is not a member of > '_GtkStyle' I just fixed this in SVN revision 35877: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/view

[Wireshark-dev] Problems Compiling under Visual Studio 2010

Anyone have the following compile problem (using Visual 2010 Ultimate) --- graph_analysis.c 12>graph_analysis.c(1450): error C2039: 'allocation' : is not a member of '_GtkStyle' 12> C:\wireshark-win32-libs\gtk2\include\gtk-2.0\gtk/gtkstyle.h(74) : see declaration of '_GtkStyle' 12>N

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1990 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reas

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2341 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/1051 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone heard of Netdude?

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:32:04PM +0100, bernoulli wrote: > In my opinion there should be a desicion by the core developers. (Speaking as only one of the core developers...) To me, it's not so much an issue of waiting for a decision to be made as it is an issue of waiting for someone to write

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 5653 - Display "Day of Year" for January 1 as 1, not 0

On 02/07/2011 07:46 PM, Guy Harris wrote: On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:52:30AM -0500, Matthew Parris wrote: Within the abs_time_to_str function, 1900 is added to the tm_year parameter, but 1 is not added to the tm_yday. I'm used to seeing the

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark packet editor (was Re: Anyone heard of Netdude?)

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:08:01PM -0800, Sam Roberts wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Gregory Seidman > wrote: > > Ah, interesting. Thanks for the info on netdude. I clearly disagree with > > you in that I think Wireshark (the project, though not necessarily the > > existing GUI) is the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone heard of Netdude?

Am 07.02.2011 21:08, schrieb Sam Roberts: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Gregory Seidman wrote: Ah, interesting. Thanks for the info on netdude. I clearly disagree with you in that I think Wireshark (the project, though not necessarily the existing GUI) is the best possible place for packet

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone heard of Netdude?

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Gregory Seidman wrote: > Ah, interesting. Thanks for the info on netdude. I clearly disagree with > you in that I think Wireshark (the project, though not necessarily the > existing GUI) is the best possible place for packet editing. Modifying packets would involv

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 5653 - Display "Day of Year" for January 1 as 1, not 0

On 7 feb 2011, at 19:46, Guy Harris wrote: > Unless the NASA guys who contributed the packet-ccsds.c and packet-vcdu.c > dissectors would like to argue that, in their dissection, a 0-origin > day-of-year works better, in which case we should support both 0-origin and > 1-origin display formats,

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1984 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reas

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone heard of Netdude?

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:18:11PM +0100, bernoulli wrote: > Though I'm not in the core dev team, I think the main task of wireshark > is sniffing the net. The main task of netdude is to edit packets in order > to do tests with packet injection later on. Because, when sniffing, we > want to be as p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone heard of Netdude?

Though I'm not in the core dev team, I think the main task of wireshark is sniffing the net. The main task of netdude is to edit packets in order to do tests with packet injection later on. Because, when sniffing, we want to be as passively as possible I think it is not necessary to do packet e

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/1045 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/1857 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason: Bui

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2331 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 5653 - Display "Day of Year" for January 1 as 1, not 0

On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:52:30AM -0500, Matthew Parris wrote: > >>> Within the abs_time_to_str function, 1900 is added to the tm_year >>> parameter, but 1 is not added to the tm_yday. I'm used to seeing >>> the day of the year equal to 1

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 5653 - Display "Day of Year" for January 1 as 1, not 0

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:52:30AM -0500, Matthew Parris wrote: > > Within the abs_time_to_str function, 1900 is added to the tm_year > > parameter, but 1 is not added to the tm_yday. I'm used to seeing > > the day of the year equal to 1 on January 1st. Does anyone use 0 > > for January 1? I

[Wireshark-dev] Anyone heard of Netdude?

I recently ran across Netdude . I haven't played with it, but it appears to have aims similar to Wireshark. It looks like Wireshark is MUCH more mature, but there may be something to be learned from it. In particular, it's primary feature seems to be that it can edit fields

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems capturing on Mac OS X

On Feb 6, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Matthew Lucas wrote: > I'm trying to run wireshark on my 2008 MacBook Pro, running Mac OS 10.6.6. > I'm an admin user and I've copied the ChmodBPF folder to > /Library/StartupItems and restarted my machine to cause it to run. On restart > I got the following error:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1982 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reas

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2329 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ipfix options

Phil, are you actually going to do this? What's the timeline-- I have a number of netflow v9 commits i need to get in... (aakh...@cisco.com) On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Philip Gladstone wrote: > Hi > > I'm looking to add names for a dozen or so IPFIX parameters. The current > code is stru

[Wireshark-dev] Bug 5653 - Display "Day of Year" for January 1 as 1, not 0

I'd like some others to comment regarding this proposed change. See Bug 5653 . > In to_str.c, the abs_time_to_str and abs_time_secs_to_str functions creates a > string for display using gmtime. This patch affects those using the > "ABSOL

[Wireshark-dev] Problems capturing on Mac OS X

Hi there,I'm trying to run wireshark on my 2008 MacBook Pro, running Mac OS 10.6.6. I'm an admin user and I've copied the ChmodBPF folder to /Library/StartupItems and restarted my machine to cause it to run. On restart I got the following error:When I navigate to /Library/StartupItems/ChmodBPF/ and

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/1854 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason: Bui