Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration

2010-05-24 Thread Guy Harris
On May 23, 2010, at 4:32 AM, H.sivank wrote: > Le 23 mai 2010 à 04:30, Guy Harris a écrit : > >> Is there any reason to continue to support the old API? > > Maybe some mac 10.4.x users ... > >> If not, we should probably just continue to use HAVE_IGE_MAC_INTEGRATION for >> this, and just chan

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake -fPIC flag

2010-05-24 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
On 2010-05-24 23:20, Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:49:44PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: >> Ah, OK, this helps me to get an idea what went wrong: I link two "static" >> libraries (libwslua and libwspython) into a dynamic lib (libwireshark). >> This seems to cause the "static" libs to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake -fPIC flag

2010-05-24 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:49:44PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > Ah, OK, this helps me to get an idea what went wrong: I link two "static" > libraries (libwslua and libwspython) into a dynamic lib (libwireshark). > This seems to cause the "static" libs to be linked/built without -fPIC. > I'll have to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed

2010-05-24 Thread Guy Harris
On May 24, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Scott wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Guy Harris wrote: >> So that means that either the IP protocol rider protocol, or the custom >> protocol, needs to have a field giving the protocol number of the protocol >> that runs top the custom protocol. Which

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed

2010-05-24 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
Hi, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:18:00PM -0600, Scott wrote: > I need to get at is the IP header's value for "Total Length" (ip.len). Is > there a function for that? packet_info->iplen ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing l

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed

2010-05-24 Thread Scott
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Guy Harris wrote: > > So that means that either the IP protocol rider protocol, or the custom > protocol, needs to have a field giving the protocol number of the protocol > that runs top the custom protocol. Which of of them has that field? > The IP Rider contai

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-05-24 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/79 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-10.04-x64 Build Re

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed

2010-05-24 Thread Guy Harris
On May 24, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Scott wrote: > Hi Guy! I hope your weekend was enjoyable. Thanks! I hope yours was enjoyable, too. > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Guy Harris wrote: >> So presumably the IP protocol rider protocol has fields of its own. >> >> Does the IP protocol rider have a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed

2010-05-24 Thread Scott
Hi Guy! I hope your weekend was enjoyable. On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > So presumably the IP protocol rider protocol has fields of its own. > > Does the IP protocol rider have an IP protocol number assigned to it, so > that you have: >link-layer protocol >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] match_strval_index with offset

2010-05-24 Thread Anders Broman
Kukosa, Tomas skrev 2010-05-24 16:40: > Hi, > > what about using _match_strval_index also if all values min-max are defined? > I.e. min>0. > The min value can be stored during match_strval_ext_init to vse->offset and > can be used later for direct index access. > What do you think? > > I thin

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2010-05-24 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/358 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: B

[Wireshark-dev] match_strval_index with offset

2010-05-24 Thread Kukosa, Tomas
Hi, what about using _match_strval_index also if all values min-max are defined? I.e. min>0. The min value can be stored during match_strval_ext_init to vse->offset and can be used later for direct index access. What do you think? Tomas __

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2010-05-24 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/300 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason: