Gerasimos Dimitriadis skrev 2010-05-16 00:42:
> Anders Broman wrote:
>
>> I'm sure the GSM/UMTS related dissectors would benefit especially if
>> "index method" can be used. Asn2wrs
>> should perhaps be changed to use the new method. I just don't have the
>> traces nor time to so benchmarking.
Anders Broman wrote:
> I'm sure the GSM/UMTS related dissectors would benefit especially if
> "index method" can be used. Asn2wrs
> should perhaps be changed to use the new method. I just don't have the
> traces nor time to so benchmarking.
> Regards
> Anders
Yes, going to O(1) will definitely m
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote:
> > Anything I'm missing here? Can you please provide a few more details on your
> > system and your cmake options?
>
> I believe Bruno was mentioning this problem that appears in
> Fedora 12 x86_64 systems:
>
> System : Fed
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:30:18PM +0100, Bruno Matos wrote:
> In version_info.c file, if we put the Python include in first place we
> remove the warning/error "_POSIX_C_SOURCE redefined", as in this
> article:
> http://bytes.com/topic/python/answers/30009-warning-_posix_c_source-redefined
>
Gerasimos Dimitriadis skrev 2010-05-15 23:12:
> Hi,
>
> I did some benchmarking on the performance gains from the switch to
> binary search in the SANC and ISPC arrays, that I want to share with the
> list. The SANC array contains ~900 entries, while the 2 ISPC arrays
> (signalling point and operat
Hi,
I did some benchmarking on the performance gains from the switch to
binary search in the SANC and ISPC arrays, that I want to share with the
list. The SANC array contains ~900 entries, while the 2 ISPC arrays
(signalling point and operator names) contain ~5k entries each.
For this experime
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/246
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason:
Joerg,
On 2010-05-15 17:47, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:37:22PM +0100, Bruno Matos wrote:
>> The -fPIC flag is missing in WIRESHARK_EXTRA_C_FLAGS variable.
>>
>> I didn't make the patch because it's too small, but I can do it if you
>> want.
>
> Interesting, it gets added au
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/279
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
B
On May 14, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>> Yes - the stuff I'm doing is still a work in progress. For example, the
>> tooltip for monitor mode is the same as the tooltip for promiscuous mode;
>> that's what I'm fixing now, and t
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:37:22PM +0100, Bruno Matos wrote:
> The -fPIC flag is missing in WIRESHARK_EXTRA_C_FLAGS variable.
>
> I didn't make the patch because it's too small, but I can do it if you
> want.
Interesting, it gets added automagically on my system:
cd /home/jmayer/work/wireshark
On 05/15/2010 08:05 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:40:36PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> If you have added a new feature in the past year, please review the
>> release notes to make sure it's listed.
>
> That's a long time to think back to :-) Are the release notes anywhe
12 matches
Mail list logo
