Re: [Wireshark-dev] How can I use preferences from other dissectors?

2010-01-08 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Alex Lindberg wrote: > I am building a heuristic dissector that shares a common tcp port > used by other dissectors. This same port is used in my dissector > and thus must be checked as part of the heuristic testing. This > port can be changed in other modules.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How can I use preferences from other dissectors?

2010-01-08 Thread Jeff Morriss
Alex Lindberg wrote: > I am building a heuristic dissector that shares a common tcp port used > by other dissectors. This same port is used in my dissector and thus > must be checked as part of the heuristic testing. This port can be > changed in other modules. Is there a method to read the c

[Wireshark-dev] How can I use preferences from other dissectors?

2010-01-08 Thread Alex Lindberg
I am building a heuristic dissector that shares a common tcp port used by other dissectors.  This same port is used in my dissector and thus must be checked as part of the heuristic testing.  This port can be changed in other modules.  Is there a method to read the configuration data from anothe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark bug on startup

2010-01-08 Thread Jeff Morriss
Julian Fielding wrote: > > Jeff Morriss wrote on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:55:02 -0500 > > >Paul Bjork wrote: > >> When I try to run Wireshark 1.2.5 with WinCap 4.1.1 (?, the latest > as > >> of today) I get just to the startup initializing screen. It says > >> > >> "Initializing dissectors"

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug

2010-01-08 Thread Maynard, Chris
I ran checkhf.pl on packet-dash.c, but it didn't pick up the duplicates, only the following: Unused entry: ../../packet-dash.c, hf_description_len Unused entry: ../../packet-dash.c, hf_oqtp_reserved Unused entry: ../../packet-dash.c, hf_reserved_bits However, I also just ran checkAPIs.pl on it, wh

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug

2010-01-08 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:39:04AM +0530, Rach, Darshan wrote: > I am getting the following error: > [Dissector bug, protocol DASH: proto.c:2457: failed assertion "(guint)hfindex > < gpa_hfinfo.len"] > > My code looks like this: > > static gint hf_epg_info_bits_len = -1; > > {&hf_epg_info_bits_

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug

2010-01-08 Thread Maynard, Chris
You have some duplicates being registered. grep "hf_" packet-dash.c | grep "static" | grep "\-1" | wc 132 6604872 grep "{&hf" packet-dash.c | wc 142 1423228 Looks like these are your culprits: hf_description hf_episode_title hf_episode_title_len hf_has_medi

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2010-01-08 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/895 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reaso

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-9.10-x64

2010-01-08 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-9.10-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-9.10-x64/builds/15 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-9.10-x64 Build Reaso

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2010-01-08 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1177 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark build fails!??!!

2010-01-08 Thread Manthos S.
Indeed! I compiled succesfully with other source files. At the time it failed i used 31441(updated to last). Now i use the last released: 31229 that could compile succesfully. I will try again the latest with positive hopes! Again thank you both for your feeback! Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:14:52

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug

2010-01-08 Thread Rach, Darshan
I checked all of those. I still get the same error. Is there any other solution for this error? From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jan Gerbecks Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 4:31 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How does Wireshark do name resolution?

2010-01-08 Thread Andrew Hood
This really belongs in "users", but since it is here ... Richard Brooks wrote: > Wireshark must have got the 'bskyb-pop3-ssl.l.google.com' result somehow. I > can do an nslookup just after Wireshark comes back with > 'bskyb-pop3-ssl.l.google.com' but I still get the same old vanilla flavoured > 'p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug

2010-01-08 Thread Jan Gerbecks
Hi, that usually means you forget to either: initialize a variable or didn't add it to the hf[] or ett[] array. Take a closer look there, Jan On 08.01.2010, at 07:09, Rach, Darshan wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting the following error: > [Dissector bug, protocol DASH: proto.c:2457: failed asser

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark bug on startup

2010-01-08 Thread Julian Fielding
Jeff Morriss wrote on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:55:02 -0500 >Paul Bjork wrote: >> When I try to run Wireshark 1.2.5 with WinCap 4.1.1 (?, the latest as >> of today) I get just to the startup initializing screen. It says >> >> "Initializing dissectors" >> >> then it hangs and is not salvageable eve