The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/5876
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason
On Mar 24, 2009, at 3:13 PM, jma...@wireshark.org quoted Andreas
Schuler:
> weiter hab ich festgestellt das das b-field nicht richtig
> dargestellt wird .
> Entweder ist g_snprintf broken , oder wir sind beide zu unfähig die
> funktion zu benutzen .
> Der string wird aus 16x %.2x + leerzeiche
If the memory is allocated within the DLL, it should be freed from within
the DLL (i.e. you should provide a function exported by the DLL to free such
memory).
Allocating memory with malloc in a DLL and free'ing it from outside the DLL
is bad mojo.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235
Hi all,
So in my dissector, i call a dll that allocates memory for information to be
returned back for output, but when i try and free the memory, i get an error. I
was wondering what the scope of the memory would be and where i should free it,
maybe i'm freeing it wrong. I allocate it in my dl
ok, my bad. I haven't read proto_tree_get_parent() documentation and was
guessing - erroneously - that it was returning a tree ... because a parent
of a tree should be a tree and not an item (in the case, one day someone
would like to have an API which differentiates proto_item from proto_tree).
R
Hi,
Le mardi 24 mars 2009 à 19:46 +0800, yami a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I've tried Didier's patch in Windows (compiled in MSVC 2005 Express
> with a few code tweak).
Great, I think you are the first on Windows, can you mail me your
change? (I haven't a Windows tool chain).
About your patch, two small st
Sébastien Tandel wrote:
> I'm not sure it's really safe and cleaner since it's
> working only because proto_item = proto_tree =
proto_node
...
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 18:48, Luca Ceresoli
> wrote:
> > my_tree = ptvcursor_add_text_with_subtree(cursor,
..,"foo");
> > my_item = proto_tree_get_par
Hi Luca,
I'm not sure it's really safe and cleaner since it's working only because
proto_item = proto_tree = proto_node and the legend says that nothing
guarantees it won't change. Then it is working now but be aware that one day
it might not work anymore.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
On Mon, Mar 2
Hi
I've tried Didier's patch in Windows (compiled in MSVC 2005 Express with a
few code tweak).
It is really fast. I hope one day it can come to trunk.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:29 AM, didier wrote:
> Hi,
> Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 10:40 +0800, yami a écrit :
>
> >
> > I'm interested in:
> >
> >
to avoid such problems it make sense to add the cygwin on the first position
instead of the end. It should no problem for other applications, because the
settings
are lost if CMD.exe is closed
I would suggest to change the batch example in the devel guide to the
following
which is working well in
10 matches
Mail list logo
