Re: [Wireshark-dev] one possible way to speed up filtering

2009-03-21 Thread yami
Hi Didier, Thank you for trying the patch :) and all the good comments given. I've attached a new patch to the wiki. Please see my detailed reply below. On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:30 AM, didier wrote: > Hi, > > Le mercredi 18 mars 2009 à 23:05 +0800, yami a écrit : > > Thanks, I've written a p

[Wireshark-dev] Unable to Display Simple Protocol Tree

2009-03-21 Thread Dix, Steven E
I've been trying to get dissector plugin that I'm coding to display subtree information that it has parsed. I can get it to look through the tvb buffer and extract the data, but I can't get it to display even the top level protocol name beneath the UDP line. As a debugging aid, I dropped in code

Re: [Wireshark-dev] XML parsing

2009-03-21 Thread Bill Meier
Bill Meier wrote: > Abhik Sarkar wrote: >> Ah, thanks Jeff; I understand now. I checked >> (http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Simple-XML-Subset-Parser.html) >> >> and it suggests it has been around since version 2.16... so I guess it >> is OK to use it. >> > > Actually: > > co

Re: [Wireshark-dev] XML parsing

2009-03-21 Thread Bill Meier
Abhik Sarkar wrote: > Ah, thanks Jeff; I understand now. I checked > (http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Simple-XML-Subset-Parser.html) > > and it suggests it has been around since version 2.16... so I guess it > is OK to use it. > Actually: configure.in requiring GTK to be 2.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] XML parsing

2009-03-21 Thread Abhik Sarkar
Ah, thanks Jeff; I understand now. I checked ( http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Simple-XML-Subset-Parser.html) and it suggests it has been around since version 2.16... so I guess it is OK to use it. Thanks for your help! Abhik. On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: